| Complaint Case No. CC/09/61 |
| | | | 1. Mrs. Roshanara Garry Bhinder | | Flat No. 93, Building 2 C, Windermere, New Link Road, Near Shantivan MHADA, Andheri (West), Mumbai - 400 053. | | Maharashtra | | 2. Master Ayman Garry Bhinder (Minor Represented by Comp. No. 1) | | Flat No. 93, Building 2 C, Windermere, New Link Road, Near Shantivan, MHADA, Andheri (West), Mumbai - 400 053. | | Maharashtra | | 3. Miss. Arainna Garry Bhinder (Minor represented by Comp. No. 1) | | Flat No. 93, Building 2 C, Windermere, New Link Road, Near Shantivan, MHADA, Andheri (West), Mumbai - 400 053. | | Mumbai 400 053 | | Maharashtra |
| ...........Complainant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. Tata AIG Life Insurance Co. Ltd. | | Through its Manager, at Unit No. 302, Building 4, Infinity IT Park, Film City Road, Dindoshi, Malad (E), Mumbai - 400 097. | | Maharashtra | | 2. Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited | | Through its Manager, 3rd Floor, Plot No. 139-140B, Near Garware Chowk, Western Express Highway, Sahar Road Junction, Vile Parle (E), Mumbai - 400 057 | | Maharashtra |
| ............Opp.Party(s) |
|
|
| ORDER | ORAL ORDER Per – Hon’ble Mr. S. R. Khanzode, Presiding Judicial Member Complainants as well as learned advocate for the Complainants are absent. Adv. Asim S. Vidyarthi is present on behalf of the Opponent No.1. Adv. Smt. Anita Marathe is present on behalf of the Opponent No.2. [2] Last appearance of the Complainants was placed on the record on 18/1/2012. On that date an adjournment was sought on behalf of the Complainants which was granted subject to payment of costs of `2,000/- payable to the Opponent No.1. It appears that costs are as yet not paid by the Complainants to the Opponent No.1. Thereafter on all subsequent dates viz. 3/5/2012, 30/8/2012, 27/11/2012, 6/2/2013, 23/4/2013 and even as on today, Complainants and their counsel remain absent. Under the circumstances, upon taking into consideration the provisions inter-alia including Rule-8(7) of the Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000, the complaint stands dismissed for default. In the given circumstances, no order as to costs. Pronounced and dictated on 30th July, 2013 | |
