Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/97/2013

S. BHUVANESWARI - Complainant(s)

Versus

TATA AIG LFE, THE REGISTRAR - Opp.Party(s)

BHUVANESWARI

09 Aug 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. FA/97/2013
( Date of Filing : 18 Mar 2013 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )
 
1. S. BHUVANESWARI
T-4, SAI VIRUTHA APARTMENTS, NO. 2, SUBHARAYAN ROAD, MYLAPORE,CHENNAI-4
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. TATA AIG LFE, THE REGISTRAR
5TH & 6TH FLOOR, PENISULA TOWERS, PENISULA CORPORATE PARK, GANPATRAO KANDAM MARG, LOWER PAREL, MUMBAI-13
2. TATA AIG LTD., THE SALES MANAGER
NO. 167-169, FIRST FLOOR, RANBAXY BUILDING, ANNA SALAI, SAIDAPET,CHENNAI-15
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 09 Aug 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

            BEFORE      Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE. R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                   Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                           ::      MEMBER

 

FA. No. 97/2013

  (Against the order in C.C. No.277/2011, dated 11.1.2013 on the file of the DCDRC, Chennai(South)

                                                                 DATED THE 9TH  DAY OF AUGUST 2021

 

1. Mrs.S.Bhuvaneswari,

W/o C.R.Sreenivasan,

T-4, Sai Virutha Apartments,

No.2, Subharayan Road,

Mylapore, Chennai 600 004

Now residing at

No.3/35, Satyanarayana 3rd street,

Shankar Nagar, Ullagaram,

Chennai 600 091                                                                        ..Appellant/complainant

                                                       Vs

1. The Registrar/Managing Director,

TATA AIA LIFE,

Corporate/Regd.Office : 5th & 6th Floor,

Peninsula Towers,

Peninsula Corporate Park,

Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel,

Mumbai – 400 013.

 

2. The Sales Manager,

TATA AIA LIMITED,

No. 167-169, First Floor,

Ranbaxy Building,

Anna Salai,

Saidapet,

Chennai 600 015                                                            ..Respondents/opposite parties

 

For Appellant/complainant                  :  Party in person

Counsel for Respondents/ops1 & 2      :  M/s B.Dhanasekaran

 

          This appeal coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :

 

                                                                                     Docket order

No representation for Appellant/party in person. Respondent Present. This appeal is posted today for appearance of both and for arguments (finally) or for dismissal.

Today when the matter came up for hearing, there was no representation for Appellant/party in person at 10.30 A.M. Hence the matter was passed over and again called at 11.30 A.M, but the appellant was again not present. Hence the appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

          Sd/-                                                                                                                 Sd/-

S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                                                         R. SUBBIAH             

          MEMBER                                                                                               PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 


 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.