Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/363/2013

I. VARKEY - Complainant(s)

Versus

TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., THE MANAGER - Opp.Party(s)

PERUMBULAVIL RADHAKRISHNAN

31 Mar 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                       BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                          Thiru.S.KARUPPIAH                                            ::  JUDICIAL  MEMBER

                                          Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::   MEMBER

 

 

FA. No. 363/2013

(Against the order in C.C. No.238/2010 dated  22.7.2013   on the file of

District Consumer Forum, Chennai(South)

 

                                                            DATED THIS THE 31^st DAY OF MARCH 2022

 

Mr.I.Varkey,

4-B, Vednivas,

52, Taylors Road,

Chennai 600 010                                                                   .. Appellant / complainant

                                               Vs

 

M/s TATA AIG General Insurance Co.Ltd,

Rep. by its Manager,

No.1, Ethiraj Salai,

Egmore, Chennai – 600 008                              ..Respondent/opposite party

 

Counsel for the Appellant / complainant        : M/s Perumpulavil Rathakrishnan

Counsel for the Respondent/opposite party    : M/s M.B.Gopalan

 

          This appeal is coming on before us for appearance of appellant and for arguments in list or for dismissal, we made the following order in open court :

                                             Docket order

          No representation for appellant. Respondent present. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and for arguments of appellant and for arguments in list or for dismissal.   When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant was not present hence, passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

  Sd/-                                                            Sd/-                                                            Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL       S.KARUPPIAH                                           R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                    JUDL.MEMBER                                           PRESIDENT