Maharashtra

Central Mumbai

MA/21/1

Smt Yogita Arun Kadam - Complainant(s)

Versus

Tata AIG General Insurance Co Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

Ganesh Shikhare

14 Oct 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CENTRAL MUMBAI
Puravatha Bhavan, 2nd Floor, General Nagesh Marg, Near Mahatma Gandhi Hospital
Parel, Mumbai-400 012 Phone No. 022-2417 1360
Website- www.confonet.nic.in
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/21/1
( Date of Filing : 06 Jan 2021 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/21/2
 
1. Smt Yogita Arun Kadam
Padali Tal Satara
Satara
Maharashtra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Tata AIG General Insurance Co Ltd
Through Its Manager, Dity Tower, 2nd Floor, Dr. S S Rao Road, Next To Gandhi Hospital Parel, Mumbai 400012
Mumbai
Maharashtra
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. S. S. Mhatre PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. M.P.KASAR MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 14 Oct 2021
Final Order / Judgement

(Below M.A.21/01 in CC 21/2 for delay condonation filed by complainant)

                  Per  Mr.M.P.Kasar , Hon’ble Member

Heard Complainant and opposite party through their Advocates, perused application and reply. The issue is whether delay is condonable? We answer yes in view of our consideration as follows –

No dispute in regard that, complainant is Illiterateand villager, it is dispute of opposite party that, complainant has not provided required documents to the opposite party as requested by letter dated 27/2/15 and complainants husband’s death is not due to accident. Considering the nature and concept and purposeofInsurance Scheme i.e.Shetkari Janta Apghat Vima Yojnawhich is admittedlyfor the agriculturist and their dependens.It has observed from the perusal of 7/12 extractat page No.23 of complainant there is name of complainant an deceased in occupancy of extract is mentioned. Perusedjudgement passed by Hon’ble State CommissioninFirst Appeal No.FA 15/623 vide dated 3/4/18  Smt.Kamalavati Suryakant Rane v/s National Insurance Company and otrs .Considering issues raised by the opposite party can be decide on meritso delay caused to file present complaint we are of the opinion that, is condonable in view of circumstances of complainant.Therfore Misc.Application No.21/01 for delay condonation is allowed and delay of4 years 4 months and 4 daysis hereby condonedin the interest of justice and no order as to cost.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. S. S. Mhatre]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. M.P.KASAR]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.