Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/85/2018

K.Malairaja - Complainant(s)

Versus

Tasildar - Opp.Party(s)

Party In Person-Applt.,

20 Nov 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. FA/85/2018
( Date of Filing : 17 Apr 2018 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )
 
1. K.Malairaja
Alanthur Dist
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Tasildar
Senthurai taluk, alanthur
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 20 Nov 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

              BEFORE   Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE. R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                 Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                            ::      MEMBER

 

FA. No. 85/2018

  (Against the order in C.C. No.29/2017, dated 1.3.2018 on the file of the DCDRC, Ariyalur)

                                                         DATED THE 20TH  DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

 

K.Malairaja @ A.Alwin Raj,

S/o A.Kani Nadar,

Opposite to G.H,

2/366-A, Periyar Nagar,

Sendurai (post),

Ariyalur District                                                 ..Appellant /party in person

                                             Vs

 

K.Amudha,

Tahsildar,

Sendurai post,

Ariyalur District                                              ..Respondent/Respondent

 

 

For Appellant                                    : Mr.K.Malairaja,  Party in person

For Respondent                               : M/s T.Ravikumar

 

            This appeal coming on on before us today, this Commission made the following order in open court :-

                                            Docket order

 

          No representation for Appellant in person. Respondent present. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and for filing written argument of appellant and for arguments in list. When this matter was called at 11.00A.M, there is no representation for the Appellant. Hence the matter was passed over and again called at 12.30 noon, but the Appellant was again not present. Since the Appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the appeal is dismissed for default. No cost.

         Sd/-                                                                                                            Sd/-

S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                                                         R. SUBBIAH             

          MEMBER                                                                                                    PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.