Haryana

StateCommission

CM/134/2016

Branch Manager, Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd - Complainant(s)

Versus

Tarsem Singh - Opp.Party(s)

17 Jan 2017

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

     

                                   Civil Miscellaneous Application No.134 of 2016

In First Appeal No.                          940 of 2013

Date of Institution:                           08.12.2016

Date of Decision:                            17.01.2017

Branch Manager, Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd., Branch Officer, 88E, Model Town near Jindal Chowk, Hisar, District Hisar, through Abhilash Chander, Assistant Manager, Legal Authorized signatory and power of attorney holder of M/s Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd., SCO 145-147, Second Floor, Sector 9C, Chandigarh.

                                      Applicant-Appellant (Opposite Party No.4)

Versus

1.      Tarsem Singh son of Charan Singh, R/o Indra Colony, Tohana, Tehsil Tohana, District Fatehabad.

 

                             Respondent No.1 (Complainant)

 

2.      Haryana State through District Collector, Fatehabad.

 

3.      S.D.O. (Civil), Tohana, District Fatehabad.

 

4.      District Social Welfare Officer, Fatehabad, District Fatehabad.

 

Respondents No. 2 to 4 (Opposite Parties No.1 to 3)

 

CORAM:             Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                            Mr. B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member.

Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member.

                                                                                                                                  

For the applicant:         Mr. Satpal Dhamija, Advocate.

 

O R D E R 

NAWAB SINGH J, (ORAL)

 

          This order disposes of miscellaneous application No.134 of 2016 filed in First Appeal No.940 of 2013 titled ‘Branch Manager, Reliance General Insurance Company Limited Versus Tarsem Singh and others’, which was dismissed by this Commission vide order dated December 24^th, 2013. Since, the appeal was dismissed, the statutory amount of Rs.25,000/­- deposited at the time of filing the appeal, was directed to be refunded to the complainant. 

2.      By filing the present application, the applicant/Opposite Party No.4 seeks refund of the said amount in its favour because the entire amount has been paid to Tarsem Singh-complainant vide Assessment Detail (Photocopy Annexure-I).

3.      In view of this, the statutory amount of Rs.25,000/- be refunded to the applicant-appellant against proper receipt and identification in accordance with rules.

4.      Disposed of.

 

January 17th  2017

Diwan Singh Chauhan Member

B.M. Bedi Judicial Member

Nawab Singh President

(D.R.)