NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/595/2011

S.D.O. 'OP' SUB-DIVISION, UHBVNL - Complainant(s)

Versus

TARLOK CHAND SINGHAL - Opp.Party(s)

MR. SURENDER SINGH HOODA

04 Apr 2014

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 595 OF 2011
 
(Against the Order dated 09/12/2010 in Appeal No. 1264/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. S.D.O. 'OP' SUB-DIVISION, UHBVNL
'OP' Sub-Division, UHBVNL, Tehsil & District Jind
Jind
Haryana
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. TARLOK CHAND SINGHAL
R/o. H. No. 188/5, Gandhi Nagar
Jind
Haryana
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN, PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI, MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
: Mr. Surender Singh Hooda, Advocate
For the Respondent :
Mr. Shubham Bhalla, Advocate

Dated : 04 Apr 2014
ORDER

           Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/complainant is agreed that, in view of the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Vs. Anis Ahmad [(2013) 8 SCC 491], the complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was not maintainable. 

 

In view of the said statement, the revision petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside with no order as to costs.   

 

 
......................J
D.K. JAIN
PRESIDENT
......................
VINEETA RAI
MEMBER
......................
VINAY KUMAR
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.