Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/22/2010

Ankur Mujral - Complainant(s)

Versus

Taneja DeveloperAnd Infrastructure Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Rajnesh Malhotra& Vandana Malhotra

17 Aug 2012

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 22 of 2010
1. Ankur Mujralson of sh.K.K. Mujral resident of House No. 173,(GF), Phase-IV, Mohali, Punjab. ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Taneja DeveloperAnd Infrastructure Ltd.(TDI), SCO No. 1098-99,Sector 22-B,Chandigarh Through its Manager/Incharge.2. The Taneja Developers And Infrastructure Ltd.(TDI), 9, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi, through its Managing Director/Chairman/Proprietor. ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Rajnesh Malhotra& Vandana Malhotra, Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 17 Aug 2012
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT FORUM – II

 

CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO.  22 OF  2010

 

PRESENT:

 

Sh. Rajneesh Malhotra, Counsel for Complainant.

Sh. S.K. Monga, Counsel for OPs.

 

Dated the 17th day of August, 2012

ORDER

 

          A compromise has been arrived at between the parties with the efforts of Lok Adalat.

 

            Sh. Rajneesh Malhotra, Advocate for the Complainant has made the following statement:-

 

            “On the instructions of my client, I do not press this complaint at this stage, due to technical defect. He has sent an e-mail to this effect, which is Annexure ‘X’. It be dismissed as withdrawn, with permission to file fresh complaint, on the same cause of action, after removal of the defects (Jurisdiction) before the appropriate Court / Forum/ Authority / Commission.”  

 

            In view of the statement made by the Learned Counsel for the Complainant, this Consumer Complaint is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file fresh complaint, on the same cause of action, after removal of the defects, before the appropriate Court/Forum/Authority/Commission. 

 

            The parties shall be bound by the statement made before this Forum.

 

            Certified copy of this order be communicated to the parties free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

 

 

 

Sd/-

(JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU)

MEMBER

Sd/-

(LAKSHMAN SHARMA)

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

     (MADHU MUTNEJA)

MEMBER

 

Sd/-

(SIDDHESHWAR SHARMA)

MEMBER


MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBERHONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER