STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
HARYANA PANCHKULA
First Appeal No.352 of 2020
Date of Institution: 10.09.2020
Date of Decision: 21.02.2022
M/s. Okinawa Autotech Pvt. Ltd. having registered office at Unit 654, JMD Megapolis, Sector-48, Sohna Road, Gurugram, through its Authorized Officer.
.….Appellant.
Versus
1. Tamana (Minor), daughter of Shri Meer Singh, R/o Basant Vihar, Ladhout Road, Gali No.1, near Rajiv Gandhi Stadium, Rohtak, through her father Shri Meer Singh.
.….Respondent
2. M/s. Viren Speedro Pvt. Ltd., 2654/4, Jind By Pass Chowk, Rohtak, through its Managing Director.
.….Proforma Respondent
CORAM: Mr.A.S. Narang, Judicial Member.
Mr. Suresh Chander Kaushik, Member.
Present:- Mr. Bhupinder Singh Gupta, counsel for the appellant.
Mr. Meer Singh, respondent No.1 in person.
Mr. Lalit Sharma, counsel for Respondent No.2.
O R D E R
A.S. NARANG, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
(The matter has been heard through virtual hearing).
Mr. Bhupinder Singh Gupta, counsel for the appellant states at Bar that compromise has been effected between the parties. He has also placed on record a copy of the order dated 14.01.2022 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rohtak. He also states that in view of the settlement between the parties, he does not want to pursue the present appeal and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
2. Present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn, in pursuance of the statement made by learned counsel for the appellant. File be consigned to the records.
3. Statutory amount of Rs.15,000/- (Rs. Fifteen thousand only) deposited at the time of filing of present appeal be refunded to the appellant against proper receipt, identification and as per rules.
February 21st, 2022 Suresh Chander Kaushik A S Narang Member Judicial Member
Addl. Bench Addl. Bench
J.Y.
