Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/155/2016

A.K. Ramalingam & Kasiyammal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Tahsildar - Opp.Party(s)

K. Gunasekar

30 Dec 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

                         BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                                                 Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.155/2016

Against the order in C.C. No.2 of 2014 on the file of DCDRC, Perambalur

                                                              DATED THE 30^TH  DAY OF DECEMBER 2021

 

 

1. Mr. A.K. Ramalingam,

  S/o Alagappa Udaiyar,

  Door No.1/116, South Street,

  Kadur Village, Kunnam Taluk,

  Perambalur District.

 

2. Kasiyammal,

   W/o A.K.Ramalingam,

  Door No.1/116, South Street,

  Kadur Village, Kunnam Taluk,

  Perambalur District

.. Appellants/ Complainants

 

 

-Vs-

 

1. Tahsildar,

   O/o. Tahsildar,

   Kunnam.  

 

2. Elangovan,

   Village Administrative Officer,

  Kadur Village, Kunnam Taluk,

  Perambalur District                                             .. Respondents / Opposite Parties             [[                                      

                                                        

Counsel for the Appellant/ Complainants            :   M/s. K. Gunasekar

Counsel for  Respondents / Opposite Parties     :   M/s. T.Ravikumar

                                                                                   

This appeal coming up before us on 30.12.2021 for appearance of appellant and for arguments (in list)   or for dismissal

 

Docket order

 

            No representation for appellant. Counsel for Respondent present. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 a.m, the appellant was not present hence, passed over and again called at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared.  Hence keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the appeal is dismissed for default.  No order as to cost.

 

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                                    Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

            MEMBER                                                                                               PRESIDENT