Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/269/2013

J. BASKARAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

T.V.S. SUNDARAM IYANGKAR SONS LTD., THE MANAGAER - Opp.Party(s)

J. BASKARAN

31 Mar 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                                             BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                                 Thiru.S.KARUPPIAH                                            ::  JUDICIAL  MEMBER

                                                                  Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::   MEMBER

 

                                                                                                FA. No. 269/2013

(Against the order in C.C. No.11/2009, dated 25.4.2013, on the file of

District Consumer Forum, Vilupuram]

 

                                                       DATED THIS THE 31^st DAY OF MARCH 2022

1.J.Baskaran,

S/o Jeyaraman,

Kanayar & post,

Ulundurpet Taluk 606 107 

 

Power Ageny of J.Baskaran,

Mr.Appaji,

General Secretary

Tamilnadu Rural State Consumer Protection Society,

Cuddalore – 607 001                                             ..Appellant/complainant

 

                                              Vs

1. The Manager,

T.V.Sundaram Iyengar & Sons,

Villupuram – 605 602                                       ..1^st Respondent/1^st opposite party

 

2. The Managing Director,

M/s Ashok Leylands Pvt.Ltd,

480, Anna Salai,

Nandanam,

Chennai – 600 015                                        ..2^nd Respondent/2^nd opposite party

 

For the Appellant/complainant                               : Party in person

Counsel for the 1^st Respondent/1^st opposite party    : M/s R.Parthasarathy

Counsel for the 2^nd Respondent/2^nd opposite party   : M/s K.Moorthy

 

          This appeal coming on before us for appearance of appellant and R2 and for arguments or for dismissal, today the non-prosecution of appellant, we made the following order in open court :-

Docket order

          No representation for appellant and R2. 1^st Respondent present. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and R2 and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant was not present. Hence, passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested  in prosecuting the case. The appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

 

   Sd/-                                                     Sd/-                                                            Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL       S.KARUPPIAH                                           R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                     JUDL.MEMBER                                           PRESIDENT