Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/314/2019

P.Kumar, Managing Partner, m/s. Sree Sivabalan Motor Finance, 253, Sooramangalam Main Road, Pallapatty Post, Salem 636 009. - Complainant(s)

Versus

T.Rajendran, S/o.thangavel, D.No.4/442-F, Kurinji Nagar, Jagir Ammapalayam Post, Salem 636 302. - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.C.Rajasekaran

31 Jul 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                             MEMBER

 

F.A. No.314/2019

 

(Against the Order dt.08.07.2019 made in C.C. No.88/2015 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Salem)

DATED THE 31^ST DAY OF JULY 2023

 

 

P. Kumar,

Managing Partner,

M/s. Sree Sivabalan Motor Finance,

No.253, Sooramangalam Main Road,

Pallapatty Road,

Salem – 636 009.                                                       .. Appellant / Opposite party. 

 

-Versus-

T. Rajendran,

S/o. Mr. Thangavel,

D. No.4/442-F, Kurinji Nagar,

Jagir Ammapalayam Post,

Salem – 636 302.                                                    .. Respondent / Complainant.

 

Counsel for Appellant / Opposite party    : M/s. C. Rajasekaran

Counsel for Respondent / Complainant  : M/s. G. Munuraj

 

                This appeal coming up before us on 31.07.2023 for appearance of both parties, for filing written arguments of both parties and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:     

                                                                                       

Docket Order

 

No representation for both parties.  

This appeal is posted today for appearance of both parties,  for filing written argument of both parties and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the appellant was not present.   Hence, passed it over and called again at 01.00 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.   Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, this appeal is dismissed for default.    No costs.

 

               

                Sd/-                                                                                                                       Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                                     R.SUBBIAH                       

             MEMBER                                                                                                      PRESIDENT