Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/217/2014

THE GENERAL MANAGER, BSNL - Complainant(s)

Versus

T.K. SAKTHIVEL - Opp.Party(s)

K.R. RAMESH KUMAR

28 Apr 2022

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                        PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.217/2014

 

(Against the Order dt.09.01.2014 made in C.C. No.34/2012 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Erode)

DATED THE 28^TH DAY OF APRIL 2022

 

 

The General Manager,

BSNL,

Gandhiji Road,

Erode.                                                                                                                                  .. Appellant / 3^rd Opposite party.

-Versus-

 

1. T.K. Sakthivel,

S/o. Mr. Krishnasamy Gounder,

Moolapalayam,

Elavalalai Post,

Vasavi College Via,

Erode Taluk.                                                                                                                     .. 1^st Respondent / Complainant.

 

2. Novatium Solution (P) Ltd.,

Represented by its Managing Director,

Block A, II Floor, No.40, M.G.R. Salai,

Perungudi,

Kandanchavadi,

Chennai – 600 096.

 

3.  Novatium Solution (P) Ltd.,

Represented by its Managing Director,

Unit 1 & 2, GF Tower,

A, Unitech World,

Cyber Park Section,

N.39, Gurgaon,

Haryana – 122 001.

4. Neelamegam,

Welcome Distributors,

D 327, Sampath Nagar,

Erode – 11.

 

5. Welcome Distributors,

Represented by its Proprietor,

D 327, Sampath Nagar,

Erode – 11.

 

6. I Net Secure Lab (P) Ltd.,

Represented by its Manager,

No.14/4, Ambalavanar Street,

Arumbakkam,

Chennai – 600 106.                                                                          .. Respondents 2 to 6 / Opposite parties 1, 2 & 4 to 6.

 

Counsel for Appellant / 3^rd Opposite party      : M/s. K.R. Ramesh Kumar

Respondents 2 & 3 / Opposite parties 1 & 2   : M/s. Dharnish Upathyay (Representative)

1^st Respondent / Complainant                         : Served called absent

Respondents 4 to 6 / Opposite parties 4 to 6  : Served called absent

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 28.04.2022 for appearance of both and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

Docket Order

 

No representation for both.  There was no representation for both parties for the past several hearings.

 This appeal is posted today for appearance of both and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the Appellant was not present.  Hence, passed over and called again at 12.30 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.    No order as to costs.

 

 

               

               Sd/-                                                                                                                Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                              R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                                PRESIDENT