BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION:HYDERABAD.

F.A.No.1771/2007 against C.C.No.21/2007, District Consumer Forum-I,HYDERABAD.

Between:

M/s.Siva Sai Builders & Developers (P) Ltd.,

Rep. by its M.D.B.H.Lakshmi, W/o.B.H.Srinivas,

O/a. 1-9-316/5, Vidyanagar,Hyderabad.                                                                                                                                                 

Smt.T.Suvarna, W/o.T.Vishnu Murthy,

Aged about 52 years, Occ:Housewife,

R/o.H.No.3-4-856, Flat No.402,

Vasantha Enclave, Barkatpura,

Hyderabad.                                                                                                                                                                                                   

Counsel for the Appellant: Mr.S.Agasthya Sharma

Counsel for the Respondent: Mr.T.Balreddy

                                               QUORUM: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO, PRESIDENT.

SMT.M.SHREESHA, MEMBER

AND

SRI G.BHOOPATHI REDDY, MEMBER.

                     TWO THOUSAND EIGHT

Oral Order:(Per Sri G.Bhoopathi Reddy ,

***

               Hyderabad           

The case of the complainant is

The complainant booked a flat 302 in 3rd floor, admeasuring 912 sft. (including common areas) along with undivided share of land admeasuring 10 sq. yds. equivalent to 8.35 mtrs. out of total extent of schedule property-A admeasuring 371 sq. yds. or 310.15 sq. mtrs. house property bearing plot No.104/Open/2/72, House bearing No.2-2-7/5/B admeasuring 371 sq. yds. or 310.15 sq. mtrs. situated near Vidyanagar Bridge adjoining Osmania University, Adikmet, Hyderabad for a consideration of Rs.10,50,000/-.      3-8-2005 Therefore the complainant got issued a legal notice to the opposite party on31-10-2006  rdVidyanagarBridgeOsmaniaUniversity, Adikmet,Hyderabad3-8-2005. 

            rd  

The points that arise for determination are

1. Whether the 

2. Whether the order passed by the Dist.Forum is sustainable. 

               the                  Hyderabad.                               The appellant further submits that the money lending transaction by the complainant      entertained by the Consumer Fora.       has relied on a judgement          Civil Court.                               Bangalore        

Point no.2 : The appellant contended that the complainant                                            complaint stipulated     

  The appeal is partly allowed .