BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH Miscellaneous Application No.81 of 2012 Ganesha Ram Vs. Syndicate Bank PRESENT: None for Applicant/Complainant. Dated the 17th day of October, 2012 ORDER The Consumer Complaint No.524 of 2011 was filed before this Forum. The complaint was dismissed for non prosecution on 15.2.2012 as neither the complainant nor any authorized agent had appeared on his behalf. The instant miscellaneous application has been filed for the relief mentioned in the complaint. In view of the ratio of the case ‘Rajeev Hitendra Pathak & ors. vs. Achyut Kashinath Karekar & anr.’ IV (2011) CPJ 35 (SC), this Forum has no jurisdiction to review its own order. Hence, the application is not maintainable and the same is dismissed in limine. The order mentioned in the letter exempting the complainant from personal appearance is not on record. Certified copy of this order be communicated to the applicant/complainant free of cost. After compliance file be consigned. Sd/- Sd/- (JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU) (MADHU MUTNEJA) MEMBER PRESIDING MEMBER
| | MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER | MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, PRESIDING MEMBER | , | | 
