Maharashtra

Central Mumbai

CC/15/180

SHRI SUNIL SAHEBRAO BHOSALE - Complainant(s)

Versus

SYNDICATE BANK THROUGH THE MANAGER - Opp.Party(s)

SHRI A. B. JAHANGIRDAR

22 Apr 2016

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CENTRAL MUMBAI
Puravatha Bhavan, 2nd Floor, General Nagesh Marg, Near Mahatma Gandhi Hospital
Parel, Mumbai-400 012 Phone No. 022-2417 1360
Website- www.confonet.nic.in
 
Complaint Case No. CC/15/180
 
1. SHRI SUNIL SAHEBRAO BHOSALE
RESIDING AT 1401/A, LUVKUSH TOWER, SINDHI SOCIETY, CHEMBER
MUMBAI-400 071
MAHARASHTRA STATE
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. SYNDICATE BANK THROUGH THE MANAGER
PRABHADEVI BRANCH, G, 001, RAJAN HOUSE, A.S.MARATHE MARG, PRABHADEVI
MUMBAI-400 025
MAHARASHTRA STATE
2. CREDIT INFORMATION BUREAU (INDIA) LTD, THROUGH THE MANAGER
HOECHST HOUSE, 6TH FLOOR, 193, BACKBAY RECLAMATION, NARIMAN POINT
MUMBAI-400 021
MAHARASHTRA STATE
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. B.S.WASEKAR PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. H.K.BHAISE MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
None present
 
For the Opp. Party:
Mr.Nishant Rana-Advocate for O.P.No.1
None present for O.P.No.2
 
ORDER

PER MR.H.K.BHAISE, HON’BLE MEMBER

None present for the complainant and the O.P.No.2. Mr.Nishant Rana-Advocate for the O.P.No.1 is present.

The complainant is not remaining present before this Forum since last many dates.  His advocate has withdrawn his Vakalatnama by filing application before this Forum.  In the application, the learned advocate for the complainant has stated that in spite of several requests and notice, the complainant is not attending him and is not ready to file his affidavit of evidence before this Forum.  The learned advocate for O.P.No.1 has submitted that the complaint was already filed by the present complainant before the Hon’ble State Commission bearing Consumer Complaint No.CC/13/367 and the same was dismissed vide order dated 4th April, 2014.  The said order was not challenged by the complainant.  Instead of challenging the said order, the complainant has filed this complaint before this Forum on the same ground and for the same relief.  Moreover, in para 17 of the complaint, the complainant has specifically stated that the amount involved in this complaint is more than Rs.20 Lakhs.  Considering this statement of the complainant in his complaint, this Forum can not entertain this complaint.  The complainant is not attending the Forum.  He failed to file his affidavit of evidence in support of his complaint.  Moreover, considering the above reasons, the complaint is not maintainable.  Considering all these aspects, the complaint stands dismissed with cost.  The complainant shall pay cost of this litigation Rs.5,000/- to each of the opponent. Inform the parties accordingly.

 

Dictated & Pronounced on 22nd April, ,2016

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. B.S.WASEKAR]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. H.K.BHAISE]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.