West Bengal

Burdwan

MA/37/2022

Aditya Agency ,ProprietorshipFirm. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Swastick Snacks, a proprietorship Firms. - Opp.Party(s)

MR.Debdas Rudra.

06 Mar 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
BDA GUEST HOUSE ( 1ST FLOOR ) KALNA ROAD BADAMTALA
Dist Purba Bardhaman - 713101
WEST BENGAL
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/37/2022
( Date of Filing : 31 May 2022 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/121/2022
 
1. Aditya Agency ,ProprietorshipFirm.
BURDWAN
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Swastick Snacks, a proprietorship Firms.
BURDWAN
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. MD. Muizzuddeen PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Lipika Ghosh MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Atanu kumar Dutta MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 06 Mar 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Order Date:  06.03.2023

 

Today is fixed for hearing the M.A. case being No. 37/2022.

Complainant files hazira through the Ld. Advocate.

In spite of having received of the notice, the OP did not turn up on 06.01.2023. Today he is also not appeared.

The M.A. case being No. 37/2022 is taken up for hearing and order.

Heard the Ld. Advocate for the complainant. Perused the complaint, case record and the petition u/S 69(2) of C.P. Act 2019 supported by an affidavit praying for condonation of delay in lodging the complaint.

It appears that the case has been lodged on 31.05.2022.  Though the cause of action firstly arose on 27.05.2019 and finally on 15.11.2019. But the Ld. Advocate for the complainant has mentioned in the petition that as per Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) No. 3 of 2020 of the Supreme Court, he has entitled to get the period for filing the case from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 for the purpose of limitation and in view of this, if the cause of action lastly arose on 15.11.2019 then the case ought to have been filed on or before 15.11.2020, which has already been exempted in view of the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. That is why the Ld. Advocate for the complainant submitted that actually there is no delay in lodging the complaint and however he has lodged this petition  to wash out any question if arise subsequently.

Under the above facts and circumstances, we are of opinion that there is no such delay for condoning the same.

However as the complainant prayed for condonation of delay of 197 days, the said prayer is allowed.

Hence, this M.A. case is thus disposed of. 

Let a copy of this order be given to the parties on free of cost.

 

Dictated and corrected by me.

 

                     President

D.C.D.R.C., Purba Bardhaman

                                        

 

                   Member                                                             Member                                   President

D.C.D.R.C., Purba Bardhaman          D.C.D.R.C. Purba Bardhaman             D.C.D.R.C., Purba Bardhaman

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. MD. Muizzuddeen]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Lipika Ghosh]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Atanu kumar Dutta]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.