West Bengal

Nadia

CC/379/2019

PULAKESH SHIL - Complainant(s)

Versus

SUVAM GHOSH, - Opp.Party(s)

09 Aug 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NADIA
170,DON BOSCO ROAD, AUSTIN MEMORIAL BUILDING.
NADIA, KRISHNAGAR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/379/2019
( Date of Filing : 02 Dec 2019 )
 
1. PULAKESH SHIL
S/O- KRISHNA GOPAL SHIL VILL.- PORAGACHA, P.O.- ASANNAGAR P.S.- BHIMPUR, NADIA- 741161
NADIA
WEST BENGAL
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. SUVAM GHOSH,
PHOTO SQUARE INDIA NEAR SANGHA MITRA CLUB SHARMA PARA LANE P.O. & P.S.- RANAGHAT W.B.- 741201
NADIA
WEST BENGAL
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. DAMAN PROSAD BISWAS PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. MALLIKA SAMADDER MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. NIROD BARAN ROY CHOWDHURY MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 09 Aug 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Ld. Advocate(s)

For Complainant:  Pritha Mondal

For OP/OPs : None

Date of filing of the case    :02.12.2019

Date of Disposal  of the case :  09.08.2023

 

Final Order / Judgment dtd.  09.08.2023

Complainant above name filed the present complaint u/s 13 Consumer Protection Act 1986 against the aforesaid OP praying for direction to pay Rs. 31,000/-, compensation amount Rs. 28,000/-. He alleged that OP is the proprietor of Photo Square India and doing  his business of photo shooting in different occasions for different individuals. Complainant  engaged the OP for Photo Shooting of his pre wedding session and marriage ceremony  and OP agreed to to do the same against the remuneration of Rs. 45,000/-. Complainant paid Rs. 16,000/- on 14.10.2018 and OP provided him one bill for the said payment. Thereafter on 31.01.2019 complainant paid further sum of Rs.15,000/- through electronic payment method as per terms and condition given by the OP. Complainant have to pay remaining amount at the time of  delivery of articles, OP  did not sent any article i.e  Video, Pendrive, or another album till date.

 Hence, the complainant filed this case.

On perusal of record we find the case is running ex-parte against the OP vide  order no. 08 dtd. 24.11.2021.

TRIAL

During trial complainant filed affidavit-in-chief.

 

DOCUMENTS

         Complainant produced following documents:

  1. Receiving endorsement regarding payment of Rs16,000/- dtd. 14.10.2018....... ( One sheet  Xerox).
  2. Payment particulars regarding payment of Rs. 10,000/-.
  3.  Payment  particulars in respect of payment of Rs. 5,000/- ( one sheet net copy).
  4. Copies of chat through Whats App ( 4 sheet   net copy).
  5. Letter of complainant to OP through e-mail dtd. 19.06.2029.( one sheet one copy)
  6. Copy of complaint filed by complainant  dtd. 11.09.2029  (  one sheet Xerox).

BNA

         Complainant filed BNA.

DECISION WITH REASONS

We have carefully gone through the petition of complaint filed by the complainant, documents filed by the complainant, affidavit-in-chief filed by the complainant and BNA filed by the complainant.

 On perusal of the record we find that case is running ex-parte against OP.

 We also find that complainant corroborated the allegation which he mentioned in the petition of complaint. Aforesaid affidavit-in-chief in nothing but unchallenged testimony.

 On perusal of the affidavit-in-chief  we find that complainant gave an order  to the OP for photo shooting of his pre weeding session and marriage ceremony and Op agreed to do the same with the remuneration of Rs. 45,000/-. Complainant paid Rs. 31,000/- in favour of the OP.

 On perusal of the money receipt dtd. 14.10.2018 we find the complainant paid Rs. 16,000/-.

 On perusal of net copy of documents, we find that complainant paid Rs. 10,000/- on 31.01.2019.

 On perusal of the another net copy of document dtd. 31.01.2019, we find that complainant paid RS. 5,000/-.

 On perusal of Whats App chat  we find that OP had different occasions gave assurance that he will deliver  the aforesaid articles   but we find from affidavit-in-chief  that complainant made contact with  him on different occasions but op did not provided aforesaid photographs in favour of the complainant. We also find that 19.06.2019  complainant gave a letter to the OP through e-mail but he did  not get any fruitful result.

On perusal of record we find that complainant is a consumer and OP is  service provider.

Having regard to the aforesaid discussion it is clear before us that complainant  paid RS. 31,000/- in favour of the OP but  he did not provide the photograph in favour of the complainant. We also find that complainant   has able to established his grievance by sufficient documents beyond reasonable doubts.

 Accordingly, we find that complainant   is entitled to relief as per his prayer.

In the result present case succeeds.

Hence,

It is

                                                Ordered

that the present case be and the same is allowed  ex-parte against the OP with cost of Rs. 3,000/- to be paid by OP in favour of the complainant.

 OP is further  directed to   hand over the aforesaid photographs in favour of the complaint  after taking balance amount of Rs. 14,000/- within the 45 days from this date or to refund the aforesaid 31,000/- in favour of the complainant within 45 days along with interest @9% per annum from the date of payment to till the date of   actual refund.

 OP is directed to pay compensation amount of Rs. 20,000/- in favour of the complainant within 45 days from this date.

 OP is directed to comply the aforesaid directions within specific  period as mentioned failing which   complainant shall have liberty to put this order into execution.

Let a copy of this order be supplied to both the parties as free of cost.

Dictated & corrected by me

 

              ............................................

                                   PRESIDENT

 (Shri   DAMAN PROSAD BISWAS,)                       .................................................

 

                                                                                                             PRESIDENT

                                                                                         (Shri   DAMAN PROSAD BISWAS,)       

            We concur,

 

             ........................................                                              ……………………………………                                                

                       MEMBER                                                                             MEMBER                                                                                                                                 

 (NIROD  BARAN   ROY  CHOWDHURY)                                  (SMT MILLIKA SAMADDAR)         

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. DAMAN PROSAD BISWAS]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MALLIKA SAMADDER]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NIROD BARAN ROY CHOWDHURY]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.