Dr. S.Varadarajan filed a consumer case on 30 Aug 2022 against Susaimary Kaspar & 3 Ors. in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is FA/769/2011 and the judgment uploaded on 01 Mar 2023.
IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
CHENNAI – 600 003.
BEFORE Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
Thiru. S. KARUPPIAH JUDICIAL MEMBER
Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL MEMBER
F.A. No.769/2011
(Against the Order dt.30.03.2011 made in C.C. No.83/2004 on the file of
D.C.D.R.C., Chengalpattu.)
DATED THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022
Dr. S. Varadarajan,
No.63, Defense Colony,
Chennai – 600 097. .. Appellant / 2nd Opposite party.
-Versus-
1. Susaimary Kaspar,
W/o. Mr. J. Kaspar,
No.21, Ottery Salai,
Puzuthivakkam,
Chennai – 600 091. .. 1st Respondent / Complainant.
2. Dr. Chandrika Manimaran,
C/o. C.M. Hospital,
No.1, 47th Street,
5th Main Road,
Nanganallur,
Chennai – 600 061.
3. Dr. Hariharan’s Diabetes and Heart Care Hospital Pvt. Ltd.,
Nos.24 & 26, 29th Street,
Nanganallur,
Chennai – 600 061.
4. M/s. Karthick Pharmacy,
Nos.24 & 26, 29th Street,
Nanganallur,
Chennai – 600 061. .. Respondents 2 to 4 / Opposite parties 1, 3 & 4.
Counsel for Appellant / 2nd Opposite party : M/s. Shivakumar & Suresh
Counsel for 1st Respondent / Complainant : M/s. K. Kumaran
Counsel for 1st Respondent / 1st Opposite party : Dr. B. Cheran
Respondents 3 & 4 / Opposite parties 3 & 4 : Served and called absent
This appeal coming up before us on 30.08.2022 for reporting settlement and for filing Joint Memo of Compromise or for arguments (in list) and this Commission made the following Order in open court:
Docket Order
Appellant/2nd opposite party and the 1st respondent/ complainant present. No representation for the 2nd respondent/1st opposite party.
Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the appellant/2nd opposite party and the 1st respondent/ complainant represented that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties and also a Joint Memorandum of Compromise has been filed to that effect. Joint Memorandum of Compromise was recorded.
In view of the Joint Memorandum of Compromise, this appeal is disposed off. The Joint Memorandum of Compromise shall form part of the order. No costs.
The appellant/2nd opposite party is entitled to the Mandatory deposit. Hence, the Registry is directed to discharge the mandatory deposit along with accrued interest in favour of the appellant/2nd opposite party.
Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-
R. VENKATESAPERUMAL S. KARUPPIAH R.SUBBIAH
MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER PRESIDENT
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.