Defects are removed.

2.      Heard  learned counsel for the  petitioner.

3.      This revision petition has been filed challenging the order of warrant of arrest issued against the O.P in spite of filing of show cause in execution proceeding pending  before the learned District Commission. According to him against the original order passed in C.C.Case No.93/12, petitioner had filed   FA No. 379 of 2013 which was dismissed for default. Thereafter, petitioner filed RA No. 43 of 2022 which is pending before this Commission.  He submitted that in spite of filing of show cause the warrant of arrest should not be  issued. Therefore, he  filed the present petition to revise the order passed in execution proceeding  No. 11 of 2020 pending before the learned District Commission , Koraput at Jeypore.

4.      Considered the submission. Perused the copies of the orders. It appears that on 19.12.22 he filed petition for time which was rejected but subsequently  present petitioner filed show cause  in March, 2023.  When the O.P appeared  and filed  show cause,   there was no necessity to issue bailable warrant of arrest.

         However, learned District Commission is directed to dispose of the matter in accordance with law within 45 days from today.

         The order dated 19.12.2022 shall remained stayed till disposal of the execution proceeding.

          Revision petition is disposed of accordingly.