Chandigarh

StateCommission

FA/150/2011

Tata Motors Limited - Complainant(s)

Versus

Surinder Singh - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. P.K. Kukreja, Adv. for the appellant

12 Jan 2012

ORDER


The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019
FIRST APPEAL NO. 150 of 2011

1. Tata Motors Limitedthrough its Sr. Manager Legal i.e. Mr. M S Pardeep, SCO No. 170-172, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
1. Surinder Singhson of Shri Mukand Singh, aged about 61 years resident of SBI Building, Taruwala, Paonata Sahib, District sirmour, Himachal Pardesh2. Hind Motors India LimitedWrongly mentioned in complaint as Hind Motors, Plot No. 9 & 15, Industrial Area, Phase IChandigarh						...........Respondent(s)

For the Appellant :

Sh. P.K. Kukreja, Adv. for the appellant, Advocate for

For the Respondent :

Sh.Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv. for resp. no. 1, Sh.Ranjan Lohan, Adv. for resp. no. 2., Advocate

Dated : 12 Jan 2012

ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

U.T., CHANDIGARH

First Appeal No.	:	150 of 2011
Date of Institution	:	14.06.2011
Date of Decision	:	12.01.2012

Tata Motors Ltd., through its Sr. Manager Legal i.e. Mr. MS Pradeep, SCO No.170-172, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh.

…Appellant/OP-1

V E R S U S

1. Surinder Singh son of Sh.Mukand Singh, Aged about 61 years, Resident of SBI Building, Taruwala, Paonata Sahib, District Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh.

....Respondent No.1/Complainant

2. Hind Motors India Ltd., wrongly mentioned in complaint as Hind Motors, Plot No.9 & 15, Industrial Area, Phase I, Chandigarh

… Respondent No.2/OP-2

Appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

BEFORE: JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER, PRESIDENT.

MRS. NEENA SANDHU, MEMBER.

S. JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL, MEMBER.

Argued by: Sh. P.K. Kukreja, Adv. for the appellant

Sh. Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv. for respondent No.1

Sh. Ranjan Lohan, Adv. for respondent No.2

PER JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL, MEMBER

For orders, see the orders passed in First Appeal No.143 of 2011 titled ‘Hind Motors India Ltd. Vs. Surinder Singh & Anr.’, vide which this appeal has also been allowed.

Copies of this order be sent to the parties free of charge.

Pronounced.

12^th January, 2012

[JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER]

PRESIDENT

[NEENA SANDHU]

MEMBER

[JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL]

MEMBER


HON'BLE MRS. NEENA SANDHU, MEMBER	HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER, PRESIDENT	HON'BLE MR. JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL, MEMBER