Chandigarh

StateCommission

FA/183/2014

SBI Life Insurance Company Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Suresh Kumar - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Rajneesh Malhotra Adv.

09 Jul 2014

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/183/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated 11/04/2014 in Case No. CC/217/2013 of District DF-I)
 
1. SBI Life Insurance Company Ltd.
UT
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Suresh Kumar
S/o Late Sh. Madho Ram, R/o House No. 3011-A, Sector-52(LIG Flats) Chandigarh
2. State Bank of India,
SCO No. 2915-16, Sector-22/C, Chandigarh through chief Manager
3. State Bank of India,
Retail Assets Central Processing Centre, SCO 103-110, 1st Floor, Sector-17/B, Chandigarh through Asstt. General Manager
4. State Bank of India,
Rampur(703), VPO Rampur Shimla Distt. Shimla Himachal Pradesh-172001 through Branch Manager
5. Chief General Manager,
State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Sector-17/B, Chandigarh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER [RETD.] PRESIDENT
  DEV RAJ MEMBER
  PADMA PANDEY MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

U.T., CHANDIGARH

                                                                 

First Appeal No.

:

183 of 2014

Date of Institution

:

16.05.2014

Date of Decision

:

09.07.2014

 

SBI Life Insurance Company Ltd., SCO 109-110, Sector 17-B, Chandigarh through Branch Manager.

 ……Appellant/Opposite Party No.3.

Versus

 

  1. Suresh Kumar s/o Late Sh. Madho Ram, R/o H.No.3011-A, Sector 52 (LIG Flats), Chandigarh.

……Respondent/Complainant.

 

  1. State Bank of India, SCO No.2915-16, Sector 22-C, Chandigarh through Chief Manager.
  2. State Bank of India, Retail Assets Central Processing Centre, SCO 103-110, 1st
  3. State Bank of India, Rampur (703), VPO Rampur, Shimla, Distt. Shimla, Himachal Pradesh – 172001, through Branch Manager.
  4. Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Sector 17-B, Chandigarh. 

  ….Respondents/Opposite Parties No.1, 2, 4 & 5.

 

Appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

 

Argued by:Sh. Rajneesh Malhotra, Adv. for the appellant.

             

              

                                                                  

First Appeal No.

:

185 of 2014

Date of Institution

:

19.05.2014

Date of Decision

:

09.07.2014

 

Suresh Kumar s/o Late Sh. Madho Ram, R/o H.No.3011-A, Sector 52 (LIG Flats), Chandigarh.

 

 ……Appellant/Complainant.

Versus

 

  1. State Bank of India, SCO No.2915-16, Sector 22-C, Chandigarh through Chief Manager.
  2. State Bank of India, Retail Assets Central Processing Centre, SCO 103-110, 1st
  3. SBI Life Insurance Company Ltd., SCO 109-110, Sector 17-B, Chandigarh through Branch Manager.
  4. State Bank of India, Rampur (703), VPO Rampur, Shimla, Distt. Shimla, Himachal Pradesh – 172001, through Branch Manager.
  5. Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Sector 17-B, Chandigarh. 

….Respondent/Opposite Parties.

 

Appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

 

Argued by:Sh. C. L. Chaudhary, Adv. for the appellant.

             

             

                  

First Appeal No.

:

187 of 2014

Date of Institution

:

21.05.2014

Date of Decision

:

09.07.2014

 

  1. State Bank of India, SCO No.2915-16, Sector 22-C, Chandigarh (Code No.4703) through Chief Manager.
  2. State Bank of India, Retail Assets Central Processing Centre, SCO 103-110, 1st
  3. State Bank of India, Rampur (703), VPO Rampur, Shimla, Distt. Shimla, Himachal Pradesh – 172001, through Branch Manager.
  4. Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Sector 17-B, Chandigarh. 

….Appellants/Opposite Parties No.1, 2, 4 and 5.

 

Versus

Suresh Kumar s/o Late Sh. Madho Ram, R/o House No.3011-A, Sector 52 (LIG Flats), Chandigarh.

 

 ……Respondent/Complainant.

 

Appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

 

BEFORE:  

               

       

 

Argued by:Sh. Sumeer Bector, Adv. for the appellants.

             

 

 

PER DEV RAJ, MEMBER.

              This order shall dispose of three First Appeals bearing Nos.183/2014 filed by Opposite Party No.3, 185/2014 filed by the complainant and 187/2014 filed by Opposite Parties No.1, 2, 4 & 5, against the order dated 11.04.2014, rendered by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh (hereinafter to be called as the District Forum only), vide which, it allowed Consumer Complaint No.117 of 2013, filed by complainant, qua the Opposite Parties, and directed them as under: -

“13]

I]    to refund a sum of Rs.138435/- being the balance amount retained by OP-3 after the surrender of the policy.

II]    to pay Rs.20,000/- as compensation for mental harassment, pain and agony suffered by the complainant due to the deficiency in service.

 III]   to pay Rs.10,000/- as litigation costs.

This order be complied with by the OPs within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, failing which they shall be liable to pay interest @12% on the awarded amount from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 26.02.2013 till its realization, besides costs of litigation.”

 

2.           The facts, in brief, are that the complainantgot housing loan of Rs.20.00 lacs, from Opposite Party No.1, i.e. State Bank of India on 16.12.2010 and monthly installments were recoverable from his salary account No.10286096712 with SBI, Sector 22, Chandigarh (Annexure C-1).  It was stated that the housing loan account number wa

 
 
[ JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER [RETD.]]
PRESIDENT
 
[ DEV RAJ]
MEMBER
 
[ PADMA PANDEY]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.