STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
U.T., CHANDIGARH
First Appeal No. | : | 180 of 2014 |
Date of Institution | : | 08.05.2014 |
Date of Decision | : | 16/06/2014 |
Nodal Officer, SBI Card, DLF Infinity Tower, Tower-C, 12th Floor, Block 2, Building 3, DLF Cyber City, Gurgaon – 122002.
……Appellant/Opposite Party No.2
V e r s u s
1.Suresh Kumar Yadav son of Late Sh. Rohtash Singh Yadav, aged about 57 years, resident of House No.2481/A, Sector 20-C, Chandigarh.
....Respondent No.1/complainant
2.Dining Plus India through its Chief Managing Director, 909 Raheja Center, Free Press General Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400021.
....Respondent No.2/Opposite Party No.1
3.State Bank of India, Main Branch, Sector 17, Bank Square, Chandigarh – 160017, through its General Manager.
Appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Argued by:Sh. Sandeep Suri, Advocate for the appellant.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Appeal No. | : | 191 of 2014 |
Date of Institution | : | 22.05.2014 |
Date of Decision | : | 16/06/2014 |
Suresh Kumar Yadav son of Late Sh. Rohtash Singh Yadav, aged about 57 years, r/o H.No.2481/A, Sector 20-C, Chandigarh.
……Appellant/complainant
V e r s u s
1.Dining Plus India through its Chief Managing Director, 909 Raheja Center, Free Press General Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400021.
...Respondent No.1/Opposite Party No.1
2.Nodal Officer, SBI Card, DLF Infinity Tower, Tower-C, 12th Floor, Block 2, Building 3, DLF Cyber City, Gurgaon – 122002.
....Respondent No.2/Opposite Party No.2
3.State Bank of India, Main Branch, Sector 17, Bank Square, Chandigarh – 160017, through its General Manager.
Appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Argued by:Sh. Balkar Singh, Advocate for the appellant.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BEFORE:
PER JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.), PRESIDENT
First
“In the light of above observations, we are of the concerted view that the Opposite Parties No. 1 & 2 are found deficient in rendering proper service to the complainant. Hence, the present complaint of the Complainant deserves to succeed against the Opposite Parties No. 1 & 2, and the same is allowed, qua them, jointly & severally, and is dismissed against Opposite Party No.3 The Opposite Parties No. 1 & 2 are directed to:-
[a]
[b] To pay Rs.7,000/- as cost ofThe above said order shall be complied within 45 days of its receipt by the Opposite Parties No. 1 & 2; thereafter, they shall be liable for an interest @18% per annum on the amount mentioned in sub-para [a] of para 14 above, apart from cost of litigation of Rs.10,000/-, from the date of institution of this complaint, till it is paid. ”
2.
3.
4. Party No.1, nor it indulged into unfair trade practice. The remaining averments, were denied, being wrong.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. Feeling aggrieved,First Appeal No.180 of 2014, titled as Nodal Officer, SBI Card Vs. Suresh Kumar Yadav and others,for setting aside the impugned order, being illegal. Whereas, on the other hand,
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20. 21.
22.
23.
24.
25. Certified copy of this order, shall also be placed, in the file ofFirst Appeal No.191 of 2014 Suresh Kumar Yadav Vs. Dining Plus India and others.
26.
27.
Pronounced.
16/06/2014
Sd/-
[JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.)]
PRESIDENT
Sd/-
(DEV RAJ)
MEMBER
Rg
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
U.T., CHANDIGARH
First Appeal No. | : | 191 of 2014 |
Date of Institution | : | 22.05.2014 |
Date of Decision | : | 16/06/2014 |
Suresh Kumar Yadav son of Late Sh. Rohtash Singh Yadav, aged about 57 years, r/o H.No.2481/A, Sector 20-C, Chandigarh.
……Appellant/complainant
V e r s u s
1.Dining Plus India through its Chief Managing Director, 909 Raheja Center, Free Press General Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400021.
...Respondent No.1/Opposite Party No.1
2.Nodal Officer, SBI Card, DLF Infinity Tower, Tower-C, 12th Floor, Block 2, Building 3, DLF Cyber City, Gurgaon – 122002.
....Respondent No.2/Opposite Party No.2
3.State Bank of India, Main Branch, Sector 17, Bank Square, Chandigarh – 160017, through its General Manager.
Appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Argued by:Sh. Balkar Singh, Advocate for the appellant.
BEFORE:
PER JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.), PRESIDENT
Vide our separate detailed order of the even date, recorded in connectedFirst Appeal No.180 of 2014, titled as Nodal Officer, SBI Card Vs. Suresh Kumar Yadav and others,this appeal has beendismissed,
2. First Appeal No.180 of 2014, titled as Nodal Officer, SBI Card Vs. Suresh Kumar Yadav and others, be placed on this file also.
3.
4.
(DEV RAJ) MEMBER | (JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.)) PRESIDENT |
Rg.
