NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2164/2012

ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

SURENDER KUMAR JAIN - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. AVA LAW ASSOCIATES

04 Oct 2012

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 2164 OF 2012
 
(Against the Order dated 09/05/2012 in Appeal No. 327/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)
1. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
3rd floot Narain Manzil, 23 Barakhamaba Road,
New Delhi - 110 001
Delhi
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. SURENDER KUMAR JAIN
S/o Sh Shek Chand Jain, R/o X/3744, first floor, Gali No-8 Shanti Mohalla,Gandhi Nagar
Delhi - 110031
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
Mr. Amit Tyagi, Advocate
For the Respondent :
For the Respondent : Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate with
Respondent-1 in person
For HDFC Bank : Mr. Rishab Raj Jain, Advocate

Dated : 04 Oct 2012
ORDER

1.          Counsel for the parties heard.  This is an admitted fact that the petitioner sent the cheque in the sum of Rs. 1,65,000/- to the Centurion Bank as per an agreement entered into between the parties. The Centurion Bank held up the said amount and did not  hand over the amount to the respondent/complainant.  However, instead of paying the said amount, it was adjusted towards complainant’s loan without intimation.  It was the duty of the Centurion Bank to inform the respondent/complainant that the said amount has been adjusted towards his loan.  The counsel for the respondent/complainant further points out that even after adjusting the same, the cheques given by the respondent/complainant were withheld by the respondent Centurion Bank.  There is no explanation for the same.  On the other hand, counsel for the respondent Centurion Bank submits that he is not aware whether the cheques were given back or the Bank is still withholding the same.  Enough opportunity was given to both the parties but this is unfortunate that the counsel for the respondent Centurion Bank is not aware of his own case. 

2.      Since the amount stands adjusted, therefore, the respondent/complainant does not pray for further relief.  He requests that heavy cost should be imposed on the part of the Centurion Bank.  3.          Under the circumstances, we dismiss the Complaint filed by the Complainant before the District Forum as withdrawn except impose Rs. 5,000/- as costs upon the Centurion Bank, which will be paid within one month, failing which, it will carry interest @ 10% per annum.  The Bank is also directed to return the cheques, if any, and if the cheques are not available with the Centurion Bank, it will file an affidavit with respect to this aspect, with the Registrar of this Commission, within one month.  It is also made clear that the Centurion Bank is now merged with HDFC Bank. 

4.          Under these circumstances, petitioner has no liability to pay any amount to the respondent/complainant.

5.      The revision petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn.

 

 

 
......................J
J.M. MALIK
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
VINAY KUMAR
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.