West Bengal

Kolkata-II(Central)

CC/81/2020

Indranil Mallick - Complainant(s)

Versus

Suprimo Travel Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Self

16 Mar 2020

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
KOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)
8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,
KOLKATA-700087.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/81/2020
( Date of Filing : 26 Feb 2020 )
 
1. Indranil Mallick
P.S and P.O Sonarpur,Dist-South 24 Parganas, Kolkata-700150.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Suprimo Travel Consultancy Pvt. Ltd.
12A, Heysham Road, Kolkata-700020.
2. Chinese Consulate General
EC-72,Sector-1,Bidha Nagar, West Bengal,Kolkata-700064.
3. Cbinese Visa Application Service Centre
BIPI Building Omega,Ground Floor, Bengal Intelligent Park,Block EP and GP,Sector-V,Bidhan Nagar, Salt Lake City,Kolkata-700091.
4. China Southern Airlines
12th Floor, Gopal Dass Bhawan,28,Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:Self, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 16 Mar 2020
Final Order / Judgement

Order No. 02        Dated :    16.03.2020

            Complainant is present in person.

            Today is fixed for admission hearing.

            Heard the complainant in person. Perused the petition of complaint coupled with its annexure thereto. On perusal of para ‘3’ of the complaint, it appears to us that complainant landed at Bangkok Airport, the Airport authority and the officials of China Southern Airline declined to check-in to China Southern Airline Flight and refused to brought him in the flight of China Southern Airlines to San Francisco on the flimsy ground that the complainant has not got any transit visa for China. It is undisputed that the complainant was declined to check-in to China Southern Airline Flight on the ground of transit Visa and such incidence took place at Bangkok Airport outside the territorial jurisdiction of this Forum. Thus, we are not inclined to admit the complaint and the complaint is liable to be dismissed in limine. Hence,

ORDERED

            That the complaint is not admitted and dismissed in limine.  

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.