Kerala

StateCommission

RP/11/11

P.SANKARAN KUTTY - Complainant(s)

Versus

SUNNY.PA - Opp.Party(s)

P.SANKARANKUTTY

28 Mar 2011

ORDER

 
Revision Petition No. RP/11/11
(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/03/2010 in Case No. IA1185/09 of District Trissur)
 
1. P.SANKARAN KUTTY
NAGATHU VEEDU,THALAVANIKKARA
TRISSUR
KERALA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SUNNY.PA
OVERSEAR,KSEB,MARATHAKKARA
TRISSUR
KERALA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

      KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL     

 COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

   REVISION PETITION.10/11 & 11/2011

JUDGMENT DATED:28-03-2011

 

PRESENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU                :  PRESIDENT

 

REVISION PETITION.10/11

 

P. Sankarankutty,

Nagath House, Thalavalinnakara,               : REVISION PETITIONER

Thalore.P.O- 680 306, Thrissur Dist.

 

         Vs.

1.      Sunny.P.A,

Overseer, KSEB Section Office,

Marathakkara. P.O- 680 306

Thrissur Dist.

 

2.      Assistant Engineer,

KSEB Section Office,, Marathakkara-

P.O- 680 306

Thrissur Dist.                                             : RESPONDENTS

 

3.      Deputy Chief Engineer,

Electrical Circle,

Kottappuram, Thrissur.

 

4.      Secretary,

KSEB, Pattom, Thiruvananthapuram.

 

 

 

REVISION PETITION.11/11

 

P. Sankarankutty,

Nagath House, Thalavalinnakara,               : REVISION PETITIONER

Thalore.P.O- 680 306, Thrissur Dist.

       Vs.

1.      Sunny.P.A,

Overseer, KSEB Section Office,

Marathakkara. P.O- 680 306

Thrissur Dist.

 

2.      Assistant Engineer,

KSEB Section Office,, Marathakkara-

P.O- 680 306

Thrissur Dist.                                             : RESPONDENTS

 

3.      Deputy Chief Engineer,

Electrical Circle,

Kottappuram, Thrissur.

 

4.      Secretary,

KSEB, Pattom, Thiruvananthapuram.

 

COMMON JUDGMENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU:  PRESIDENT

 

 

         Both the matters are with respect to the alleged failure on the part of the opposite party/KSEB in not producing the documents sought to be produced by the complainant, ie the minimum guarantee agreement etc.  Revision-10/11 is with respect to the order in I.A.1186/09 filed by the complainant who is conducting the case in person to take action against the opposite parties under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act.  The Forum has dismissed the above application observing that invoking of section 27 is not necessary.

      2. Revision petition-11/2011 is with respect to the order in     I.A.1185/09 wherein he has sought for assistance of the Police Vigilance to procure the documents.  The Forum has dismissed the same also and directed the KSEB to produce the documents.

     3. The complainant/Revision petitioner has also pleaded that the Forum ought to have provided cost as the matter has been adjourned for about a dozen times.

   4.   In the circumstances the Forum is directed to see that the matter is disposed of at the earliest at any rate within 6 months from the date of receipt of this order and also to see that the opposite parties are ordered to pay cost if the matter is protracted on account of the lapse of the opposite parties to produce documents etc.  Revision petition is disposed of as above.

     Office will forward a copy of this order to the Forum.

 

JUSTICE K.R. UDAYABHANU:  PRESIDENT

VL.

 

 

 
 
[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.