NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/272/2009

RAM KUMAR BHUKAL & 3 ORS. - Complainant(s)

Versus

SUNITA - Opp.Party(s)

MR. G. L. MALIK

15 Apr 2009

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 272 OF 2009
(Against the Order dated 25/11/2008 in Appeal No. 1838/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. RAM KUMAR BHUKAL & 3 ORS.Field Officer, Gurgaon gramin Bank, Near Dena Bank, Old Railway Raod, Gurgaon Haryana 2. SARDA VERMAGurgaon Gramin Bank,Near Dena Bank , Old Railway Road Gurgaon Haryana ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. SUNITAW/o. Brahma Nand, R/o, 621/1, Gali No.2, Ashok Vihar GurgaonHaryana ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.N.P. SINGH ,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. DR. P.D. SHENOY ,MEMBER
For the Petitioner :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 15 Apr 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Perused review application (No. 123/2010) filed by petitioner for review of order dated 04.05.2007 passed in RP No. 1453/2007 which was dismissed by this Commission on said date with a direction to Registry that in case further review application is filed, the same shall not be entertained by the office. He also seeks review of order dated 24.11.2009 by which RP No. 272/2007 was disposed of while remitting the matter to State Commission. Petitioner has wrongly filed review application stating that order dated 24.11.2009 passed by this Commission was also in respect of RP 1453/2007 amalgamating them with RP No. 272/2007. As move of petitioner for reconsideration of the order dated 04.05.2007 did not find favour with Commission, vide order dated 18.07.2008, review application filed, was dismissed in limine. As for review of order dated 24.11.2009 passed in RP 272/2009, apart from belated filing of review application, there being no error apparent on face of the record, review application is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to cost.


......................JB.N.P. SINGHPRESIDING MEMBER
......................DR. P.D. SHENOYMEMBER