Haryana

Kurukshetra

165/2018

Mehar Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sunita - Opp.Party(s)

In Person

23 Jan 2019

ORDER

Mehar Singh etc versus Sunita etc.

Present:       Sh. S.S.Malik, Advocate for complainant.

                   Sh Paras Manocha, Advocate for OP No.2 & 3.

                   OP NO.1 In Person.

                  Heard. As per the compromise of legal heirs Ex.C-1 vide which there is no other legal heir except Sh. Mehar Singh son of sh. Baru Ram, Satya Devi wife of Sh. Mehar Singh, Sunita widow of Sh. Rameshwar and Jivika (Minor) D/o late sh. Rameshwar. Smt. Suinta is the guardian of monir namely Jivika. In such like circumstances Ops No.2 & 3are directed to pay the insured amount to the legal heirs namely Mehar singh, Satya devi, Sunita Devi and Jivika (Minor) is equal share with 30 days,failing which legal heirs are entitled interest on the amount @90% per annum form the date of order till its realization.File be consigned to record room after due compliance.

Dated 23.01.2019                                                        President

                                           Member        Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.