Haryana

StateCommission

RP/20/2018

DHFL PRAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE AND ANOTHER - Complainant(s)

Versus

SUNITA - Opp.Party(s)

KARAN NEHRA

24 Apr 2018

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA

 

 

                                                Revision Petition No.   20 of 2018

                                                Date of Institution :      06.03.2018

                                                Date of Decision   :      24.04.2018

 

 

1.      DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance Company Limited, 4^th Floor, Building No.98, DLF City, Gurgaon.

 

2.      DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance Company Limited, Rohtak.

 

          Petitioners No.1 and 2 through Mr. Parmal Singh – DM, Legal of DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance Company Limited (earlier known as DLF Pramerica Life Insurance Company Limited) having its Registered Office at 4^th Floor, Building 9B, DLF Cyber City, Phase III, Gurgaon-122002. 

Petitioners-Opposite Parties

 

Versus

 

Smt. Sunita w/o late Sh. Phool Singh, resident of House No.409, Shastri Marg, Gali No.2, Indira Colony, Rohtak.

Respondent-Complainant

 

CORAM :   Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President

                   Shri Balbir Singh, Judicial Member.

 

                  

Present :             Sh. Tarun Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.

                   Sh. Rohit Goswami, Advocate for the respondent.

                                     

O R D E R

 

 

 

NAWAB SINGH J, (ORAL)

 

          By filing this revision petition, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance Company Limited-opposite parties (petitioners herein) have challenged the order dated December 07^th, 2017 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Rewari (for short ‘District Forum’) whereby their application to summon Dr. M.M. Talwar and Dr. Suraj Chaudhary, Talwar Nursing Home, Sirsa, was dismissed. 

2.      It is the case of the petitioners that Phool Singh (Deceased Life Insured) was suffering from acute depression.  He committed suicide due to depression.  So, evidence of Dr. M.M. Talwar and Dr. Suraj Chaudhary, Talwar Nursing Home, Sirsa is required to adjudicate the matter in a more complete and effective manner. 

3.      Be that as it may and considering the golden principle that everyone approaching the temple of justice should feel satisfied in the matter of getting opportunity to present his or her case as good as he or she can, this revision petition is accepted and impugned order is set aside.

4.      It is recorded for the sake of clarity that the District Forum is asked to take oral evidence of Dr. M.M. Talwar and Dr. Suraj Chaudhary, Talwar Nursing Home, Sirsa and complainant would also be granted opportunity to rebut the same.

5.      Copy of this order be sent to the District Forum.

 

Announced 24.04.2018

(Balbir Singh) Judicial Member

(Nawab Singh) President

 UK