Orissa

StateCommission

RP/28/2016

SDO, WESCO Utility - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sunil Kumar Jain - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. P.K. Tripathy & Assoc.

07 Sep 2016

ORDER

Notice was sent to opposite party no.1 by registered post with AD on 8.6.2016 , but SR has not yet been backed though in the meantime, more than one month has elapsed. so, notice against o.p. no.1 is held to be sufficient.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. None appers on behalf of o.p. no.1 on call.

 In the interim order dated 31.03.2016 passed in C.C. no.22 of 2016, the District Forum, Kalahandi directed o.p. no.1 to deposit Rs.5,000/- immediately in the counter of petitioner no.1 to deposit of Rs.5,000/- immediately in the counter of petitioner no.1 and submit the money receipt before it and the latter was directed to restore electricity to the premises of o.p.no.1 within 24 hours of receipt of the said amount of Rs.5,000/- o.p. no.1 was also directed to pay the current electricity charges as per the meter reading. Then order was passed fixing the date to 6.5.2016 for filing written version and objection to the petition filed U/s 13(3)B of C.P. Act as well as to comply of the aforesaid order.

Being aggrieved with the order dated 31.03.2016 as ststed earlier, petitoners have preferred this revision petition.

Under such circumstances as stated earlier, the petitioners are directed to file objection to the petition filed U/s. 13(3)B of C.P. Act, if not filed earlier and thereafter, the District Forum shall hear both the parties on the petition filed U/s 13(3)B of the C.P. Act by o.p. no.1 and pass appropriate order.

With the aforesaid observation, the revision petition is disposed off.