NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/297/2013

TATA MOTORS LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

SUNANDA SANGWAN & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.

13 Oct 2014

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 7 OF 2013
 
(Against the Order dated 01/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1731/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. MALWA AUTOMOBILES PVT. LTD.
NH01.119/4 K.M STONE G.T ROAD
KARNAL
HARYANA
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. SUNANDA SANGWAN & ANR.
D/O SH CHANGER MANI, R/O HOUSE NO-447 SECTOR-13 URBAN ESTATE
KURUKSHETRA
HARYANA
2. TATA MOTORS LTD.
REGIONAL OFFICE AT: JEEVAN TARA BUILDING, 5 SANSAD MARG
NEW DELHI
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 297 OF 2013
 
(Against the Order dated 01/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1731/2011 & 1704/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. TATA MOTORS LTD.
LALA BAHADUR SHASTRI MARG, WAGLE ESTATE,
THANE - 400604
MAHARASTRA
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. SUNANDA SANGWAN & ANR.
D/O SH CHANGER MANI, R/O HOUSE NO-447 SECTOR-13 URBAN ESTATE
KURUKSHETRA
HARYANA
2. MALWA AUTOMOBILES PVT. LTD.
THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR/MANAGER, NH01.119/4 K.M STONE G.T ROAD
KARNAL
HARYANA
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRESIDING MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
In RP No. 7/2013
For the Petitioner : NEMO
In RP No. 297/2013
For the Petitioner : Mr. Aditya Narain, Advocate
Mr. Aakarshan Sahya, Advocate
Mr. Arnav Narain, Advocate
For the Respondent :
In RP No. 7/2013Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Shishpal Laler, Advocate
For the Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Aditya Narain, Advocate
Mr. Aakarshan Sahya, Advocate
Mr. Arnav Narain, Advocate
In RP No. 297/2013Respondent No.1: Mr. Shishpal Laler, Advocate
For the Respondent No. 2: NEMO

Dated : 13 Oct 2014
ORDER

          Heard learned counsel for the parties.

          This Commission vide order dated 20th September, 2013 disposed of both the revision petitions but matter was kept for compliance on 16-12-2013. Complainant also filed SLP against this order, which was later on withdrawn.  In the meantime, parties have also filed compliance report.  It would be appropriate to direct parties to approach to the District Forum for execution of order if necessary compliance has not been made and this Commission need not to get it executed at this stage.

          Consequently, parties are made free to approach before District Forum for execution of order passed by this Commission.

Matter may be consigned to record room.

 

 
......................J
K.S. CHAUDHARI
PRESIDING MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.