Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/334/2011

Kingfisher Airlines Limited,Rep.by.its.Chairman and Managing Director, Kingfisher Airlines Limited, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Suman Bonkurthi, S/o.Gangadher Bonakurthi,H.No.10-18, Vidyanagar Colony, - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.Vijay Sagi,C-10, DAD Complex, Lekha Nagar, Tirumalgiri,

28 Sep 2012

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/334/2011
(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/03/2011 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/28/2010 of District Medak)
 
1. Kingfisher Airlines Limited,Rep.by.its.Chairman and Managing Director, Kingfisher Airlines Limited,
Kingfisher House, Western Express Highway,Vile Parle (E), Mumbai-400 099.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Suman Bonkurthi, S/o.Gangadher Bonakurthi,H.No.10-18, Vidyanagar Colony,
Pothireddipally Village, Sangareddy Mandal, Medak District, A.P.
2. 2.Make My Trip (India) Private Limited,
Udyog Vihar, Phase-I,
Gurgaon-122 616.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO PRESIDING MEMBER
 HONABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar MEMBER
 
PRESENT:M/s.Vijay Sagi,C-10, DAD Complex, Lekha Nagar, Tirumalgiri,, Advocate for the Appellant 1
 
ORDER

BEFORE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: AT HYDERABAD

 

F.A.No. 334 OF 2011 AGAINST C.C.NO.28 OF 2010 DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM MEDAK AT SANGAREDDY

 

Between:

Kingfisher Airlines Ltd.,

Kingfisher House, Western Express Highway
Vile Parle (e) Mumbai-099.
Bangalore-011

Through its authorized representative

                                                       

       

 

1.  Shri SumanBbonakurthi S/o Gangadhar Bonakurthi
aged 24 years, Occ: Student in UK R/o H.No.10-18
Vidyanagar Colony, Pothireddipally Village,
Sangareddy Mandal, Medak Dist

Respondent/complainant

2.  Make My Trip (India) Pvt Ltd.,
Udyog Vihar Phase-I, Gurgaon-616
                                               

 

Counsel for the Appellants            

Counsel for the Respondents                                               

 QUORUM:

                           

                                                                              

 

                       

                       

 

                 

1.     

2.   `28,031/- to travel to Vietnam on 23-10-2009 from Hyderabad online (Shamshabad Airport) through the second opposite party. The journey was scheduled from Shamshabad to Calcutta and there from to Vietnam on the appellant airlines. As per the  `4979/- and travelled on Indigo Airlines on 23-10-2009 and reached Hyderabad.

3.               

4.             

5.                

 6.           

 7.    

8.             9.             

10.           

 

11.    The appellant requested the first respondent to submit his visa for him to travel to Bangkok; he failed to submit the documents. 

12.    

13.           `28,031/- to travel to Vietnam on 23.10.2009 from Hyderabad form the second respondent.    

14.      

15.              `21,436/- made on 23.11.2010, he approached the District Forum which had not considered the documentary evidence except referring to a document, proceeded to find deficiency in service on the part of the appellant.

16.             

17.            

18.      

 

                                                                                      

 

                                                                                                                                                                 KMK*

 

 

                                                          

 
 
 
 
 
[HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HONABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.