Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/144/2016

Ajay Kumari - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sukhwinder Singh, Assistant Manager, (Collections) BAJAJ FINANCE Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

In Person

01 Mar 2016

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II
U.T. Chandigarh
FINAL ORDER
 
Complaint Case No. CC/144/2016
 
1. Ajay Kumari
W/o Sh. Sandeep Gupta, R/o H.No. 512, Sector 38-A, Chandigarh.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sukhwinder Singh, Assistant Manager, (Collections) BAJAJ FINANCE Ltd.,
S.C.O. No. 26, 1st Floor, Sec. 26, Chandigarh.
2. BAJAJ FINANCE LTD.,
S.C.O. No. 26, 1st Floor, Sec. 26, Chandigarh through its Branch Head.
3. BAJAJ FINANCE LTD.,
4th Floor, Bajaj Finserv Corporate Office, Off Pune-Ahmed Nagar Road, Viman Nagar, Pune-411014, Maharashtra, India through its Managing Director.
4. BAJAJ FINANCE LTD.,
Mumbai Pune Road, Akurdi, Pune-411035, Maharashtra, India through its Company Secretary.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. RAJAN DEWAN PRESIDENT
  MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU MEMBER
  MRS PRITI MALHOTRA MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
Sh. Sandeep Gupta, Authorized Agent for the complainant
 
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 01 Mar 2016
Final Order / Judgement

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh

 

 

CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 144  OF  2016

Ajay Kumari Vs Sukhwinder Singh, Assistant Manager (Collection)  Bajaj Finance Ltd.

BEFORE:

                   HON’BLE MR. RAJAN DEWAN PRESIDENT

                   HON’BLE MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU MEMBER

                   HON’BLE MRS. PRITI MALHOTRA MEMBER

PRESENT:

                   Sh. Sandeep Gupta, Authorized Agent for the complainant

Dated : 01/03/2016

ORDER

                    Sh. Sandeep Gupta, Authorized Agent for the complainant  has made the following statement, recorded separately: -

                   “Due to technical defect, I do not press this complaint at this stage. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant reserves his right to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the technical defect”.

                   In view of the aforesaid statement made by counsel for complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be at liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the technical defect before the appropriate Authority/Court/Forum/Commission, as per law.

                   Certified copy of this order be communicated to the complainant free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

 

 

 

 

 

Sd/-

[RAJAN DEWAN]

PRESIDENT

 

 

 

Sd/-

[JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU]

MEMBER

Sd/-

[PRITI MALHOTRA]

MEMBER

 

js

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. RAJAN DEWAN]
PRESIDENT
 
[ MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU]
MEMBER
 
[ MRS PRITI MALHOTRA]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.