Kerala

StateCommission

A/10/501

VETTORAN TECHNOLOGIES AND OTHER - Complainant(s)

Versus

SUKADAKUMARI.A.K - Opp.Party(s)

PACHALLOOR.R.JAYAKRISHNAN

06 Nov 2010

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. A/10/501
(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/05/2010 in Case No. CC09/205 of District Thiruvananthapuram)
 
1. VETTORAN TECHNOLOGIES AND OTHER
VETTOORAN TECHNOLOGIES,KOWDIAR
TRIVANDRUM
KERALA
2. SHIBU RAVEENDRAN,MANAGING PARTNER
VETTOORAN TECHNOLOGIES,KOWDIAR
TRIVANDRUM
KERALA
3. SHYAM RAVINDRAN
PARTNER,VETTORAN TECHNOLOGIES,KOWDIAR
TRIVANDRUM
KERALA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SUKADAKUMARI.A.K
T.C8/98(1)SREE VIHAR,THIRUMALA
TRIVANDRUM
KERALA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL

COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

 

APPEAL No. 501/2010

 

JUDGMENT DATED:06-11-2010

 

 

PRESENT:

 

JUSTICE SHRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU              :PRESIDENT

 

SHRI.S. CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR                             : MEMBER

 

1.         Vettoran Technologies,

R/by its Managing Partner.

 

2.         Shibu Ravindran,

Managing Partner,

M/s Vettoran Technologies,                                : APPELLANTS

Kowdiar, Trivandrum-3.

 

3.         Shyam Ravindran,

Partner, M/s Vettoran Technologies,

Kowdiar, Trivandrum-3.

 

(By Adv.Sri.Pachallur.R.Jayakrishnan Nair)

 

            Vs.

Sukadakumari.A.K,

T.C.8/98(1), Sreevihar,                                           : RESPONDENT

Thirumala, Trivandrum-6.

 

(By Adv.Sri.S.Williams)

 

   JUDGMENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU:PRESIDENT

 

The appellants are the opposite parties in CC.205/2009 in the file of CDRF, Thiruvananthapuram.  The appellants are under orders to pay a sum of Rs.89,076/- and Rs.5000/- as compensation and Rs.1500/- as costs.

The matter relates to the defective laptop purchased by the complainant from the opposite parties for a sum of Rs.98,000/-.  The opposite parties/appellants remained exparte before the Forum.  It is the case of the appellant that the managing partner was abroad at the time notice was received from the Forum.  The reason mentioned is hardly sufficient to justify the absence of the opposite party before the Forum.   All the same, in view of the fact the matter has been disposed of uncontested the appeal is allowed on payment of cost of Rs.7500/- to the complainant. On deposit of the above sum, the Forum will permit the opposite parties to file version and contest the case.  The case stands posted before the Forum on 14/12/2010.

Office will forward copy of this order to the Forum urgently.

 

 

JUSTICE K.R. UDAYABHANU:PRESIDENT

 

 

 

S. CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR : MEMBER

 

VL.

 

 
[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.