Orissa

StateCommission

RP/27/2022

M.D., Axis Bank Ltd., - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sujit Mohapatra - Opp.Party(s)

M/S R.Roy & Associates.

18 May 2022

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ODISHA, CUTTACK
 
Revision Petition No. RP/27/2022
( Date of Filing : 06 May 2022 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/04/2022 in Case No. CC/27/2022 of District Jagatsinghapur)
 
1. M.D., Axis Bank Ltd.,
Corporate Office, Axis House, 7th Floor, C-2, Wadia International Centre, Pandurag Budhakar Marg, Worli, Mumbai.
2. Manager, Axis Bank Ltd.,
Plot No. 501, 1st Floor, Centre Point, Kharvel Nagar, Bhubaneswar.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Sujit Mohapatra
S/o- Santosh Mohapatra, Vill- Chunaberi, Po- Paradeepgarh, Ps- Paradeep Lock, Dist- Jagatsinghpur.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. D.P. Choudhury PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Pramode Kumar Prusty. MEMBER
 HON'BLE MS. Sudihralaxmi Pattnaik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:M/S R.Roy & Associates., Advocate for the Petitioner 1
 
Dated : 18 May 2022
Final Order / Judgement

 

         Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

2.      Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that learned District Commission, Jagatsinghpur has passed ex parte order without hearing the OPs and at the same time, passed ex parte interim order against the OPs   not to repossess the asset  (vehicle) bearing Registration No. OD-04Q-9633 and not to take any coercive action against the vehicle of the complainant. He further submits that the complainant is in arrear  of some EMI dues. So, he submitted that the impugned order should be set aside and liberty be given to the OPs to hear on the interim application.

3.      Considered the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners and   perused the impugned order. There is no defect in exercising the jurisdiction by the learned District Commission. But when there is arrear amount pending against the complainant, the impugned order passed by the learned District Commission is defective by passing such order without any condition imposed on the complainant. Therefore, the revision petition is disposed of by revising the impugned order to the extent that the OPs shall not take any coercive action against the complainant and he vehicle subject to deposit of Rs.60,000/- by the complainant with the OPs within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

4.      The revision petition is disposed of accordingly.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. D.P. Choudhury]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Pramode Kumar Prusty.]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MS. Sudihralaxmi Pattnaik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.