Learned counsel for the parties heard.  Litigation charges in the sum of Rs.10,000/- not paid.  Address of respondent not mentioned properly.

          The petitioner wanted to file the medical certificate dated 18.5.2008.  The State Commission rejected it on the ground that it was being filed after four years.  The same doctor had issued another medical certificate Ext A-5 dated 8.3.2008, which was received in evidence. 

          The reason given by the petitioner is that such document could not be filed in time because the same was sent to the claimant’s department for processing of the claim and it was misplaced. Consequently, the same could not be filed at the proper time.

          We have to take care of the fact that this document is not manipulated.  Consequently, we allow the request made by the petitioner subject to the condition that the petitioner will also file the affidavit of the doctor alongwith this document and pay Rs.10,000/- as costs to the complainant  in person through demand draft directly, which must carry correct address and particulars.  If the petitioner again fails to pay the amount through demand draft, costs of Rs.5,000/-  will be imposed.  The parties are directed to appear before the State Commission on 28.1.2014 and the documents will be produced.  The State Commission will see to it that the said amount i.e. litigation charges as well as the costs for allowing this application stands paid to the respondent only then it will proceed further.  It will also give an opportunity to rebut this evidence produced by the respondent.  All litigation charges and costs i.e. Rs.20,000/- will be paid to the respondent/complainant with correct name and particulars otherwise the amount shall be enhanced to Rs.25,000/-.  This is also made clear that this document finds mention in the written statement.

          The revision petition is disposed of accordingly.