Tamil Nadu

Thiruvallur

CC/149/2022

M.Kumaresan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sudar Mobiles (Authorized Tecno Service Centre), - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Person

31 Jan 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
THIRUVALLUR
No.1-D, C.V.NAIDU SALAI, 1st CROSS STREET,
THIRUVALLUR-602 001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/149/2022
( Date of Filing : 08 Jul 2022 )
 
1. M.Kumaresan
No.9A, Palayakkara St., Enambakkam Village & Post, Uthukottai Tk,Thiruvallur Dist.,
Tiruvallur
TAMIL NADU
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sudar Mobiles (Authorized Tecno Service Centre),
No.41, R.S.Road, KAttu Koil St., Gummidipoondi Tk, Thiruvallur Dist.,
Tiruvallur
TAMIL NADU
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L.,Ph.D(Law) PRESIDENT
  THIRU.J.JAYASHANKAR, B.A.,B.L., MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Party in Person, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 -, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 31 Jan 2023
Final Order / Judgement

                                                                                                                   Date of filing:       27.05.2022
                                                                                                                   Date of disposal: 31.01.2023

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVALLUR

 BEFORE  TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L, Ph.D (Law)                  .…. PRESIDENT
                 THIRU.P.MURUGAN,M.Com.ICWA(Inter),B.L.,                                       ....MEMBER-II

CC. No.149/2022
THIS TUESDAY, THE 31st DAY OF JANUARY 2023


Mr.M.Kumaresan, S/o.V. Munivel,
No.9A, Palayakkara Street,
Enambakkam Village & Post,
Uthukottai Taluk, Thiruvallur District.                                           ……Complainant.     
                                                                          //Vs//
Sudar Mobiles,
(Authorized Teeno Service Center),
No.41, R.S. Road,
Kattu Kolli Street, Gummidipoondi,
Gummidipoondi Taluk, Thiruvallur District.                             .......Opposite party 

  The complaint was filed by the complainant under section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 alleging deficiency in service in selling defective mobile phone along with a prayer to direct the opposite party to refund  a sum of Rs.9,000/- cost of the product and to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards compensation for the mental agony and hardship caused to the complainant due to the deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite party along with cost of the proceedings to the complainant. 
No representation for complainant.  Sufficient opportunities given for appearance of complainant and for dismissal to take private notice for the opposite party on 24.08.2022, 15.09.2022, 23.09.2022, 11.10.2022, 20.10.2022, 10.11.2022, 05.12.2022, 20.12.2022, 29.12.2022, 11.01.2023, 27.01.2023 and on 31.01.2023.  In spite of the same, complainant failed to appear and prosecute the case. Hence, this commission is of the view that no purpose in keeping the complaint on file.  Hence the consumer complaint is dismissed for non prosecution.  No cost.
This order was pronounced by us in the open Commission on this 31st December 2023. 

   Sd/-                                                                                                                    Sd/-

MEMBER-II                                                                                                  PRESIDENT

 

 

 
 
[ TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L.,Ph.D(Law)]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ THIRU.J.JAYASHANKAR, B.A.,B.L.,]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.