Kerala

Palakkad

CC/14/2020

Sureshbabu .C.P - Complainant(s)

Versus

Subramaniyan - Opp.Party(s)

08 Jul 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PALAKKAD
Near District Panchayath Office, Palakkad - 678 001, Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/14/2020
( Date of Filing : 23 Jan 2020 )
 
1. Sureshbabu .C.P
S/o. Kumaran, Cholangaparambil, Pookottukavu, Kadambur Po, Ottapalam, Palakkad.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Subramaniyan
Kalkhi Electros, Hospital Junction, Main Road, Mannarkkad
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Vinay Menon.V PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Vidya A MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Krishnankutty. N.K MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 08 Jul 2022
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PALAKKAD

Dated this the 08th  day of  July, 2022

 

Present  :  Sri.Vinay Menon V., President        

             :   Smt.Vidya  A., Member

             :   Sri. Krishnankutty N.K.,Member

              

Date of filing: 23/01/2020

                                           CC/14/2020

 

 Sureshbabu C.P,                           -               Complainant

 S/o. Kumaran, Cholangaparambil,

 Pookottukavu, Kadambur (PO),

 Ottapalam, Palakkad-

 (Party in person) 

                                                  Vs

 Subramaniyan,                                        -             Opposite Party

 Kalkhi Electros

 Hospital Junction

 Main Road, Mannarkkad.

 (Party in person)

     

                                                 O R D E R

By Sri. Krishnankutty N.K., Member

 

1.Pleadings of the complainant in brief.

 

             The complainant submitted an application to Pookottukavu Krishi Bhavan for sanctioning an agricultural  pump set under their subsidy scheme.  As advised by the Krishi Bhavan he approached the opposite party for a quotation for the pump set.  According to the complainant, he paid an advance amount of Rs.4000/- to the opposite party  for getting the quotation, which he submitted to the above Krishi Bhavan  along with the pump set  application. 

   

                    Even after a lapse of 1 year, Krishi Bhavan did not sanction the pump set and when he approached them it was informed that they are not permitting pumpsets  now and hence the complainant  can approach the opposite party and get hack the advance paid.  When he approached the opposite party on 04.01.2018, and again on 08.02.2018, they refused to pay back the amount.

Hence the Complaint

 2.            Notice was issued to the opposite party and he entered appearance on 24.02.2020 and filed his version.  According to him, the complainant has never approached him for any quotation for pumpset, instead came to his shop on 03.12.2016 for purchasing a pumpset along with its accessories.  He enquired about the details of the pumpset and finally purchased the items as per the tax invoice issued No.248 for Rs.10548/-.

                    Years after this, the complainant approached the opposite party for return of the pumpset and accessories which was denied by the opposite party.  

3.          The complainant filed proof affidavit on 27.02.2021 wherein he has repeated his contention in the complaint, that he has paid an amount of Rs. 4000/- as advance to the opposite party for getting the quotation for submission to the Krishi Bhavan.  He was in touch with the Krishi Bhavan till October 2019 and  on 10.10.2019 Krishi Bhavan informed him that the pumpset scheme is already stopped by them, and then he approached the opposite party and asked for the refund  of the advance  amount of Rs.4000/-.

 4.              The evidence produced by the complainant is the copy of tax invoice for Rs.10548/- which is marked an Exhibit  A.1.and chit showing some calculation  which has not been marked as it lacks  evidentiary value .

  5.       From the above narrations we are not in a position to draw any specific conclusion as to whether the allegation made by the complainant is genuine or not.  The tax invoice produced as evidence  is the record of a sale transaction taken place on 03.12.2016, which has never been admitted by the  complainant either in the complaint or in proof affidavit.  This transaction clearly shows that he purchased the pumpset, and not gone for the quotation as mentioned.  Further he has not produced any document to show that an amount of Rs.4000/- was paid as advance.

6.          From 28.04.2021 onwards both the parties were not present for  the proceedings of the  complaint.  Hence taken for orders based on merit.

7.          From the aforesaid narration it is evident that the complainant has failed   to prove that an amount of Rs.4000/- was  paid to the opposite party as advance. 

           The entire complaint which is hovering around this advance

  amount of Rs.4000/-  which the complainant claim to have paid to the

 opposite party has not been proved beyond  doubt.

            Hence the complaint is dismissed.

Pronounced in the open court on this the 8th day of July, 2022

                                                                              Sd/-

                                                                               Vinay Menon V

                                     President

                                                                                       Sd/-     

                                                                                 Vidya A

                                    Member

 

             Sd/-          Krishnankutty N.K

                                                                                    Member

 

 

 

Exhibits marked on the side of complainant

Ext. A1– Invoice No-248 dated 03.12.2016.

Exhibits marked on the side of Opposite parties

Nil

Witness examined from complainant’s side:- NIL

Witness examined from opposite party’s side:- NIL

Cost:

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Vinay Menon.V]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Vidya A]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Krishnankutty. N.K]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.