NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/4017/2011

KISHANCHAND PANNALAL BAJAJ & ANR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

SUBHASH RANGNATH DABHADE - Opp.Party(s)

MR. S.P. ADGAONKAR

13 Jan 2012

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 3978 OF 2011
 
(Against the Order dated 30/08/2011 in Appeal No. 1345/2003 of the State Commission Maharastra)
1. KISHANCHAND PANNALA BAJAJ & ANR.
R/o Complainant - 83 Town Center, CIDCO
Aurangabad
Maharastra
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. AZIZ SAHEB
R/o C-1 Bajaj Nagar, Aurangabad Road, Jaina
Aurangabad
Maharastra
2. Sou Latea Omprakash Bajaj
R/o Complainant-83 Town Center, CIDCO
Aurangabad
Maharastra
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 3979 OF 2011
 
(Against the Order dated 30/08/2011 in Appeal No. 1346/2003 of the State Commission Maharastra)
1. KISHANCHAND PANNALAL BAJAJ
R/o Complainant - 83 Town Center, CIDCO
Aurangabad
Maharastra
2. Sou Latea Omprakash Bajaj
R/o Complainant-83 Town Center, CIDCO
Aurangabad
Maharastra
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. BHARAT BHIVSAN PATIL
R/o C-1 Bajaj Nagar, Aurangabad Road, Jaina
Maharastra
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 3980 OF 2011
 
(Against the Order dated 30/08/2011 in Appeal No. 1348/2003 of the State Commission Maharastra)
1. KISHANCHAND PANNALAL BAJAJ
R/o Complainant - 83 Town Center, CIDCO
Aurangabad
Maharastra
2. Sou Latea Omprakash Bajaj
R/o Complainant-83 Town Center, CIDCO
Aurangabad
Maharastra
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. BAPUSHA YADA THOMBRE
R/o C-1 Bajaj Nagar, Aurangabad Road, Jaina
Maharastra
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 4017 OF 2011
 
(Against the Order dated 30/08/2011 in Appeal No. 1347/2006 of the State Commission Maharastra)
1. KISHANCHAND PANNALAL BAJAJ & ANR.
R/o Complainant -83 Town Center, CIDCO
Aurangabad
Maharastra
2. Sou Lata Omprakash Bajaj,
R/o Complainant- 83 Town Center, CIDCO
Aurangabad
Maharastra
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. SUBHASH RANGNATH DABHADE
R/o C-5 Bajaj Nagar, Aurangabad Road
Jaina
Maharastra
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 4018 OF 2011
 
(Against the Order dated 30/08/2011 in Appeal No. 1349/2006 of the State Commission Maharastra)
1. KISHANCHAND PANNALAL BAJAJ & ANR.
R/o Complainant -83 Town Center, CIDCO
Aurangabad
Maharastra
2. Sou Lata Omprakash Bajaj,
R/o Complainant- 83 Town Center, CIDCO
Aurangabad
Maharastra
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. SATISH BHAUSAHEB NAIK
R/oB-4 Bajaj Nagar, Aurangabad Road
Jaina
Maharastra
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. C. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. S. K. NAIK, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :MR. SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 13 Jan 2012
ORDER

Delay in filing the revision petitions, if any, is condoned. Counsel for the petitioner / builder does not challenge these revision petitions on the quantum of compensation granted by the Fora below but his anxiety / apprehension appears to be that the orders passed by the Fora below in such like matters will become precedent. Having considered the matters and submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner, we dismiss the revision petitions as devoid of any merit, however, with the observation that the orders passed by the Fora below shall be treated on the facts of these cases and will not constitute the precedent.

 
......................J
R. C. JAIN
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
S. K. NAIK
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.