West Bengal

Jalpaiguri

CC 35/2014

Sawar Kumar Agarwal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Subhash Agarwal(Devsaria) - Opp.Party(s)

Milindo Paul

01 Apr 2015

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, JALPAIGURI
JALPAIGURI
 
Complaint Case No. CC 35/2014
 
1. Sawar Kumar Agarwal
S/O Sri Jayesh Prakash Agarwal, Resident of 13/2/1, Dr. P.K.Banerjee Road, Mullick Fatak, Howrah 711101, presently residing at Babupara, P.O. and P.S.- Siliguri, Dist.- Darjeeling, ward no.26 Siliguri
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Subhash Agarwal(Devsaria)
S/O Motilal Agarwal(Devsaria), Resident of Chamurchi, P.O. Chamurchi, P.S. Banarhat, Dist.- Jalpaiguri, 735207
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Asoke Kumar Das PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. Bina Choudhuri MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Prabin Chettri MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

Order No. -21                                                                                 Dt.-01/04/2015

Mr.  A. K. Das, President

 

Case record is placed for passing final order as per order no. 20 passed to day.

Complainant’s case in short that he is a Chartered Accountant by profession. The OP was holding a flat in his position in the 1st Floor of Aradhana Apartment at Deshbandhupara near YMA, Club Siliguri. The OP wanted to sale his said flat on valuable consideration. In July 2011 the complainant was in need of residential accommodating and so he approach OP for his flat and offered Rs.12,50,000/- as consideration of sale of that flat. The OP accepted the offer and it was agreed by them that they would enter into a written agreement after complainant’s return from Kolkata. It was agreed by and between the complainant and the OP that the consideration of the flat would be Rs.12,50,000/- and the earnest money would be 1,01,000/- and that the registration would be done with in 6th months from the date of verbal agreement i.e. From 1st week of July 2011. The complainant has paid Rs.1,01,000/- to the OP towards earnest money by cheque dt. 21/07/’11. It is alleged by the complainant that he contacted the OP for geeting the agreement in Black & White but the OP was reluctant in the matter. In the month of Dec.2011 the complainant came to learn from the OP that the said flat had already sold to another person by OP on receiving higher value. The OP gave assurance to the complainant to repay the earnest money with interest with in March 2012 but the OP didn’t pay a penny to the complainant. The complainant there after requested to OP several times to re-pay his dues but OP paid no heed.

 

Hence, this case.

 

Notice was issued upon the OP which was duly served and the OP also appeared but finally he did not contest the case.

 

Hence, the case is hard ex-parte.

 

Seen and perused the petition of complaint. We have hard argument of Ld Lawyer for the complainant. Ld Lawyer has referred a judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal no(s) 6197 of 2000 dt. 17/12/2008 in support of his contention that the oral agreement between the parties to this case regarding sale of OP’s flat is valid. Seen and perused the judgement passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India referred by Ld. Lawyer for the complainant. We find that in this judgement Hon’ble Supreme Court has observed that, “An agreement of sale comes into existence when the vendor agrees to sale and the purchaser agrees to purchase, for an agreed consideration on agreed terms. It can be oral.....”. So, in view of the judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India we find that there was oral agreement between the parties to this case over sale of OP’s flat to the complainant which was effected from the 1st week of July 2011. Its appears from paragraph no.6 of the petition of the complainant that the registration should be done within 6th months from the date of verbal agreement dt. 1st week of July 2011. Admittedly registration was not done within 6th months i.e. Within 1st week of Jan.2012 by the OP as per terms of the oral agreement. Therefore the complainant should have file this case against the OP within 2 years i.e. on or before 1st week of Jan.-2014, i.e. within the period of limitation as per provision of C.P.Act1986. But the complainant has filed this case on 25/03/2014 i.e. after expiary statutory period  of limitation.

 

In this view of the matter we fine and hold that this case is not maintainable as this case was filed after expiary of the statutory period of limitation as per C.P. Act 1986.

 

Hence, the complainant is not entitled to get any relief in this case and the case is liable to be dismissed.

 

Hence, it is

                                                 Ordered

that the case stands dismissed ex-parte without cost.

Let copy of this final order be supplied to the complainant free of cost forthwith in terms of Sec.5(10) of West Bengal Consumer Protection Rules 1987.

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Asoke Kumar Das]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MS. Bina Choudhuri]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. Prabin Chettri]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.