Sri Jagamohan Dora filed a consumer case on 12 Jun 2019 against Subham Enter Prises in the Rayagada Consumer Court. The case no is CC/72/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 03 Aug 2019.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
POST / DIST: Rayagada, STATE: ODISHA, Pin No. 765001.
******************
C.C. Case No. 72 / 2017. Date. 12 . 06 . 2019.
P R E S E N T .
Dr. Aswini Kumar Mohapatra, President
Sri Gadadhara Sahu, Member.
Smt.Padmalaya Mishra, Member
Sri Jagamohan Dora, S/O: Sri Bansidhara Dora, At/Po: 13/2,J.K.Pur, Po/Dist: Rayagada , 765 017 (Odisha). … Complainant.
Versus.
1.The Manager, Subham Enterprises, Eureka Forbes Ltd., Goutam Nagar, 5th lane, Rayagada, Dist: Rayagada cell No. 94371-75001, 9938527069.
2.The Manager, Head office, Bhupesh Gupta Bhawan, 85, Sayani Road, Prabhadevi, Mumbai-400-025.
3.The Manager, Eureka Forbes Ltd., H.O. B/1,B/2, 7th. Floork, Marathan Next Gen Innova off, Gantafro Kadam Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai- 400 013. ..Opposite parties.
For the Complainant:- Sri Jagannath Dora, Advocate, Rayagada.
For the O.Ps :- In person.
JUDGEMENT
The factual matrix of the case is that the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service against afore mentioned O.Ps for non refund of Aquaguard price which was found defective within the warranty period for which the complainant sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.
On being noticed the O.Ps. appeared in person and filed Memo. Though the O.Ps have not filed written version but after receipt of the notice from this forum the parties are amicable settled between the complainant and O.Ps outside the forum and the complainant filed a memo submitted that on DT. 10.6.2019 the service centre of Aquaguard company has came to his house and made repair of Aquaguard water filter. Now the said filter is running good condition. The complainant further submitted that he wants withdrawal of the above case with a condition of further extend of warranty to the replaced parts. Hence the O.Ps prays the forum to close the case accordingly .
Heard arguments from the O.Ps and from the complainant. Perused the record, documents, filed by the parties.
This forum examined the entire material on record and given a thoughtful consideration to the arguments advanced before us by the parties touching the points both on the facts as well as on law.
This forum observed the O.Ps considering the exigencies of the matter with out any basis in the right time properly settled the disputes at his end to avoid further litigation by over looking all the deficiencies without contesting the present case in the sense of humanitarian point of view by following the principles of natural justice in view of justice as contemplated the Modos Operandi of the O.Ps no doubt worthy of credence.
During the course of hearing the complainant also consented to close the above case against the O.Ps
We perused the documents filed by the complainant as well as the O.Ps. In our considered view there is nothing to disbelieve the contents of the O.Ps regarding their service to the satisfaction of the complainant and forum do not find any reason to hold the O.Ps.
Accordingly the present dispute mitigated and the case stands disposed and O.Ps wriggled out of liabilities & the case closed against them as the complainant do not want to proceed with the case further against the O.Ps after received service from the O.Ps. Parties are left to bear their own cost.
The O.Ps are directed to extend further one year warranty to the above goods from the date of this order.
Dictated and corrected by me
Pronounced on this 12 th. Day of June, 2019.
Member. Member. President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.