Andhra Pradesh

Visakhapatnam-II

CC/388/2014

Smt. Bolisetty Nagamalleswari - Complainant(s)

Versus

Subhagruha Projects (India) Private Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Chintada Venkata Prasad

27 Jul 2015

ORDER

                                              Date of Registration of the Complaint:05-12-2014

                                                                                                Date of Order:27-07-2015

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMERS FORUM-II AT

                             VISAKHAPATNAM

 

P  r  e  s  e  n  t:

 

1.   Sri H. Ananda Rao, M.A., L.L.B.,

     President           

2. Smt K. Saroja, M.A. B.L.,

     Lady Member 

                                3. Sri C.V. Rao, M.A., B.L.,

                                     Male Member

 

               Tuesday, the 27th day of July, 2015.

                                   CONSUMER CASE No.388/ 2014

Between:-

Smt. Bolisetty Nagamalleswari, W/o late

Gangadhara Tilak, Hindu, House-wife,

aged 49 years, residing at Door No. 50-47-8,

P & T Colony, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam-13.

                                                                                       …. Complainant   

 And:-                                                                                  

Subhagruha Projects (India) Pvt. Ltd., reptd.,

by its Managing Director, Office is situated at

Door No. 50-50-33/3, J.R. Plaza, 1st Floor,

Gurudwara Junction, N.H.5, Visakhapatnam.

                                                                                … Opposite Party

 

This case coming on 27.07.2015 affidavit of both sides before us in the presence of Sri Chintada Venkata Prasad, Advocate for the Complainant and Sri D. N. Murthy, Advocate for the Opposite Party and having stood over till this date for consideration, this Forum made the following:

                                                ORDER

         (As per Sri H. Ananda Rao, Honourable President on behalf of the Bench)

 

          The Complainant’s Advocate filed not press memo after issuing notice to the Opposite Party who reported no objection stating not press this complaint.   Heard both sides.  Memo is recorded.  Complaint is dismissed as not pressed without costs.                                                                        

                                                                                                   

Sd/-                                               Sd/-                                              Sd/-

Male Member                              Lady Member                        President

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.