Haryana

Karnal

CC/672/2022

Ved Parkash - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sub Divisional Officer - Opp.Party(s)

23 Jan 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.672 of 2022

                                                          Date of instt.28.11.2022

                                                          Date of Decision:23.01.2024

 

Ved Parkash son of Shri Balraj R/o village Daya Nagar, Post Office Raison, Tehsil Nigdhu, District Karnal.

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

1. Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division, UHBVNL Nigdhu, Karnal.
2. Director UHBVNL, Sector-6, Shakti Bhawan, Panchkula.

 

                        ....Opposite parties.

  Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Dr. Suman Singh………….Member.

               

Present:   None for the complainant.

                Sh. Amit Kumar Kamboj, counsel for the OPs.

                                                         

               Today the case is fixed for evidence of the complainant. No evidence is present. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. Position remained the same on the adjourned date. It is already 03:30 PM. No further wait is justified.

                   A careful perusal of the file reveals that in the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OPs on 06.07.2023. The complainant has availed several effective opportunities for leading his evidence but the complainant has failed to conclude the same. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint.

                   Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified as it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission.

                   Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated:23.01.2024             

                           President,

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Suman Singh) 

  Member                Member