Siba Prasad Padhi filed a consumer case on 10 Aug 2022 against Sub Divisional Officer in the Sambalpur Consumer Court. The case no is CC/57/2016 and the judgment uploaded on 12 Aug 2022.
PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SAMBALPUR
Consumer Case No-57/2016
Present-Dr. Ramakanta Satapathy, President,
Sri. Sadananda Tripathy, Member,
Siba Prasad Padhi,
S/O-Dutikrushna Padhi,
At/Ps/Po-Burla, Dist- Sambalpur, Odisha. ………….Complainant
Vrs.
Sub Divisional Officer, Officer of the Sub-Divisional Officer,(Elect),
Distribution sub-Division, Burla, At/Po/Ps-Burla,
Dist-Sambalpur. …….Opp. Party
Counsels:-
DATE OF HEARING :XXXXXX, DATE OF JUDGEMENT :10.08.2022
Presented by Dr. Ramakanta Satapathy, PRESIDENT.
Issue No.1 Whether this complaint is not maintainable in view of the unauthorized consumption of electricity by the Complainant?
The Complainant is his complaint on 30.10.2014 alleged that Sri. A.K. Mahapatra visited the spot and letter No. 384 dated 31.10.2014 was issued imposing Rs. 46,894/- computing the penal bill. Learned Advocate for O.P. cited the decision of Hon’ble Apex court, U.P. power corp.ltd & others V.Anis Ahmed, SLP No. 35906/2011. “Against the assessment order passed under section 126 of the Electricity Act a consumer has option to file appeal under section 127 of the electricity Act or filing complaint. He has to select either of the remedy.”
No any criminal proceeding has been initiated by the O.P. Accordingly, against the order of assessment this complaint was filed on 13.07.2016 within two years of the alleged illegal assessment i.e. dated 31.10.2014.
Accordingly, this Forum/Commission has jurisdiction to entertain the complaint.
Issue No.2 Is the O.P. deficient in his service?
The O.P has not filed any documents. In the interim order this Forum prima-facie observed that the O.P. has doubled the energy charges, whereas according to sec. 126, sub-section 3 they can impose one and half time the charges. The details of the current bills are as under:
April 2014 - Rs.2623.00
May 2014 - Rs.1566.00
June 2014 - Rs.1302.00
July 2014 - Rs.1452.00
Aug. 2014 - Rs.1302.00
Sept. 2014 - Rs.1452.00
Oct. 2014 - Rs.22394.00
Nov. 2014 - Rs.5660.00
Dec. 2014 - Rs.5338.00
Jan. 2015 - Rs.4211.00
Feb. 2015 - Rs.30,000.00
There is in consistency in the electricity bills. As per statement of the O.P. in Feb. 2015 the bill was including penal assessment (final) and monthly electricity bill. It is the admission of the O.P. that excessive assessment was made and after objection the bill was reduced for a period of six months.
Accordingly the issue is answered against the O.P.
Issue No.3 What relief the Complainant is entitled to get?
For the deficiency in service of the O.P. the Complainant is entitled for relief. It is ordered:
ORDER
The Complaint is allowed on contest against the O.P. The O.P. is warned not to disconnect the power supply of the complainant without following due procedures and directed to pay compensation of Rs. 10,000/- and Rs. 10,000/- litigation expenses within one month along with interest @7% w.e.f. 31.10.2014, failing which the amount will carry 12% interest P.A. till realisation.
Order pronounced in open court on this 10th day of August 2022.
Supply free copies to the parties.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.