Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/86/2023

Sri Kali Charan Jena, aged about 60 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sub Divisional Engineer, Electrical, Saragan, Balasore - Opp.Party(s)

Sj. Prashanta Kumar Mallik

15 Jul 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/86/2023
( Date of Filing : 05 Aug 2023 )
 
1. Sri Kali Charan Jena, aged about 60 years
S/o. Lt. Nilamani Jena, At/ P.O- Bardhanpur, P.S- Sadar, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sub Divisional Engineer, Electrical, Saragan, Balasore
At- Saragan (32412), R.E No.11 (3241) Sub- Division, Balasore (TPNODL).
Odisha
2. J.E- cum- Section Manager, Electrical, Saragan
At/ P.O- Saragan, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
3. Asst. Manager (Elect.), R.E.- II, Balasore
Sub- Division, Balasore.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Sri Sudhakar Mohanty, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Sri Sudhakar Mohanty, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 15 Jul 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case is posted today for filing of postal tracking report/ fresh step against O.P No.3 by complainant as last chance. Advocate for the complainant is absent, no steps filed. Advocate for the O.Ps No.1 & 2 is present and files hazira along with one sheet of document. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. Perused the case record.

                                         In the present case, the O.Ps No.1 & 2 were appeared & filed w/v. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 30.09.23 to till today except 16.10.23, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Further, in spite of several directions for filing of postal tracking report/ fresh step against O.P No.3, neither the complainant nor his Advocate filed the same. Hence, the case against O.P No.3 is dismissed. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is presumed that the complainant has no interest to prosecute his own case. Considering the nature & conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.