Shri Avinash V Prabhune, Member

1        It is matter of records that Complaint was admitted on 20.01.2020 & Notices was issued to O.P. Complainant & his counsel were continuously absent since 24.02.2020 & did not take any steps to serve Notice to O.P. Complainant was directed to appear before Commission vide letter dtd 25.04.2022 issued by this Commission.

2.       Ld Counsel for Complainant appeared before Commission on 13.07.2022 & prayed for issuing fresh Notice to OP. Ld Counsel submitted postal tracking report on 06.10.2022 regarding service of Notice to OP but it was noticed that Notice sent to OP was returned back with postal remarks as ‘Insufficient address’. Complainant & his counsel did not take any step to serve Notice to OP thereafter & remained continuously absent on all subsequent dates i.e. on 20.10.2022, 24.11.2022, 22.12.2022, 20.01.2023, 06.03.2023, 21.03.2023 & Today also on 23.05.2023.

3.       It is clearly evident from above records that  ample opportunities have been given to Complainant during last three years to take steps & prosecute matter but Complainant had failed to take steps, therefore, it appears that Complainant has lost interest in the matter & does not want to prosecute the Complaint further.

4.       In view of the above facts & circumstances, Commission is of the firm opinion that present Consumer Complaint deserves to be dismissed for want of prosecution, hence dismissed.

ORDER,

1) Consumer Complaint is dismissed for want of prosecution.

2) No order as to Costs.