Maharashtra

StateCommission

A/10/942

SHREE PARADISE CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD - Complainant(s)

Versus

STAYWELL BUILDERS, MR DEEPAK JHUMARLAL DHUMAVAT - Opp.Party(s)

SANJAY MADHURKAR

12 Oct 2011

ORDER

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
 
First Appeal No. A/10/942
(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/01/2010 in Case No. 422/08 of District Additional DCF, Pune)
 
1. SHREE PARADISE CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD
B4,5 SHREE PARADICE NEAR BALIVAR BHANGARWADI LONAVALA
PUNE
MAHARASHTRA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. STAYWELL BUILDERS, MR DEEPAK JHUMARLAL DHUMAVAT
D-47 LONAVALA TAL MAVAL
PUNE
MAHARASHTRA
2. MR AJIT SONRAJ BHURAT
B4,5 SHREE PARADICE NEAR BALIVAR BHANGARWADI LONAVALA
pune
MAHARASHTRA
3. MRS SUREKHA ANIL BHURAT
B4,5 SHREE PARADICE NEAR BALIVAR BHANGARWADI LONAVALA
PUNE
MAHARASHTRA
4. MRS SHARDA RAJENDRA PARAKH
B4,5 SHREE PARADICE NEAR BALIVAR BHANGARWADI LONAVALA
PUNE
MAHARASHTRA
5. RS APRANA SACHIN PARAKH
B4,5 SHREE PARADICE NEAR BALIVAR BHANGARWADI LONAVALA
PUNE
MAHARASHTRA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode PRESIDING MEMBER
 Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kawde MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Mr.Manoj Gadkari-Advocate for the applicant/appellant
......for the Appellant
 
None for respondent
......for the Respondent
ORDER

Per Mr.S.R.Khanzode, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member

Notice on delay condonation application was issued.  From the Roznama dated 07/06/2011, it appears that Mr.L.K.Jadhav-Advocate for the non applicant/respondent present but today he is absent.  Mr.Manoj Gadkari-Advocate for the applicant/appellant, present.

In these circumstances, we prefer to hear the applicant /appellant on delay condonation application.  There is delay of six months in filing the appeal.  Only reason given is that after receipt of certified copy, advocate for the appellant could not prepare and file appeal due to his personal difficulties.  But the name of the lawyer is not mentioned. Reason given is quite vague, not at all satisfactory, much less to explain such an inordinate delay.  We hold accordingly and pass the following order:-

                                      ORDER

Misc.application no.MA/10/491 for condonation of delay stands rejected.

In the result, appeal does not survive for consideration.

Copies of the order be furnished to the parties.

 

Pronounced on 12th October, 2011.

 

 
 
[Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kawde]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.