West Bengal

Murshidabad

CC/75/2014

Md. Nazimuddin - Complainant(s)

Versus

Station Manager & A.E. Bhagawangola, - Opp.Party(s)

17 Aug 2016

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Berhampore, Murshidabad.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/75/2014
 
1. Md. Nazimuddin
S/O- Abdul Jalili Sarkar, Vill- Char L abangola,
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Station Manager & A.E. Bhagawangola,
Fr. CCC, Bhagawangola,
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SAMARESH KUMAR MITRA PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. PRANATI ALI MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 17 Aug 2016
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MURSHIDABAD AT BERHAMPORE.

CASE No.CC/ 75/2014.

 Date of Filing: 16.06.2014.                                                                          Date of Final Order: 17.08.2016.

 

Complainant :  Md. Nazimuddin , S/O Late Abdul Jalil Sarkar, Vill. CharLabangola,

                        P.O. Hanumantnagar, P.S. Bhagawangola, Dist. Murshidabad.

-Vs-

Opposite Party: Station Manager, A.E. Bhagawangola Gr. CCC, P.O.&P.S. Bhagawangola,

                            Dist. Murshidabad.

                       Present:                                

                                         Sri Samaresh Kumar Mitra ……………………..Member.           

                                                Smt. Pranati Ali ……….……………….……………. Member

 

FINAL ORDER

 

             Sri Samaresh Kumar Mitra, Presiding Member.

 

            This case has been filed by the complainant u/s 12 of C.P. Act, 1986 praying for passing an order directing the OP to reconnect the electric  line of the complainant and compensation for Rs. 40,000/- for mental pain and agony.

Today is fixed for filing show cause by the complainant as to why the complaint should not be disposed of due to non-prosecution.

            The complainant, without putting his signature on it, files a time petition casually praying for further time as before  which is , in our opinion, not a show cause petition. So, the petition is rejected.

            From the order sheets, it appears that the case is in hearing stage. The complainant has been dragging the case since 12.03.2015 without advancing argument. Several opportunities were given to the Complainant to make argument in his favour but only submitting adjournment petitions day after day, the complainant performs his duty. In our view, the complainant is not interest to proceed with this case.

            Hence,

                                                                    Ordered

that the Consumer Complaint No. 75/2014 be and the same is hereby dismissed for non -prosecution. 

            There will be no order as to cost.

 

Let a plain copy of this order be made available and be supplied free of cost, to each of the parties on contest in person, Ld. Advocate/Agent on record, by hand under proper acknowledgment / be sent forthwith under ordinary post  to the concerned parties as per rules, for information and necessary action.

 

 

 

Member                                                                                   Member

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SAMARESH KUMAR MITRA]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PRANATI ALI]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.