Today is fixed for Admission Hearing.
The Ld. Advocate for the complainant is present.
He submits that the complainant is a consumer of OP No.1 as he has electric connection in his Plot No. 3412 of Mouza Sarbangapur.
It is argued that the OP No.2 in connivance with the OP No.1 has been trying to execute the final order passed in C.P Case No. CC/205/2004 dated 18/04/2006 with a mala fide manner. It is further urged that the OP Nos. 1&2 are trying to draw over-headlines on Plot No. 3412 with a view to give electric connection in Plot No.3411 without obtaining any ‘way leave’ permission as per rules.
It is contended that the complainant apprehends that his electric connection will be disturbed, if the OP No.2 is allowed to get electric connection at Plot No. 3411 through the Plot No. 3412.
It is also urged that the OP No.1 may be restrained from drawing over head electric line over the Plot NO. 3412 for installation of electric meter at Plot No. 3411.
We have gone through the documents filed by the complainant and the complaint petition.
Let us consider whether the complainant is a ‘’Consumer’’ and is there any “consumer dispute” between the parties.
The complainant has asserted in his complaint that he is a consumer of electricity under the OP No. 1 at his residence at Plot No. 3412. It has also been asserted by the complainant that he apprehends that his electric connection may be disturbed, if the OP No.1 is allowed to draw over head line over his Plot No.3412.
There is no deficiency in service on the part of the OP no.1 till today mere apprehension in future is not a ground for admitting the case. The complainant has not hired any service of the OP No. 1 & there is no consumer dispute between the complainant & the OP No.2 and the apprehension of consumer dispute between the complainant and the OP No. 1 cannot be entertained. Hence, we find no reason to admit the complaint.
Hence, the CC/79/2018 be and the same is here by dismissed as not admitted, as we find no ‘consumer dispute’ between the parties.
