Haryana

Karnal

CC/203/2023

Smt. Anju - Complainant(s)

Versus

State Of Haryana - Opp.Party(s)

S.S. Moonak

05 Apr 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL

                                                                    Complaint No.203 of 2023

                                                                   Date of Instt. 03.04.2023

                                                                   Date of Order: 05.04.2023

 

1. Smt. Anju, age 33 years, wife of late Sh.Rakesh Kumar)Aadhar No.5349 0008 9335)
2. Prince Kali Ramne, age 15 years , son of late Sh.Rakesh Kumar , through his mother Smt.Anju as next fried and natural guardian, both residents of village Bazida Jattan, Tehsil and District Karnal.

                                                                             ……….Complainant

                                                Vs

1. State of Haryana through Collector, Karnal.
2. Island water Park, G.T.Road, near village Kohand, Tehsil Gharaunda, District Karnal-132114 through its Proprietor /partner/authorized person.
3. Shri Hukam Singh Deswal son of Sh.Banwari Lal, proprietor /partner Island Water Park, G.T.Road, near Village Kohand, Tehsil Gharaunda, Distt. Karnal-132114 resident of House No.8, Sector 6, Urban Estate, Karnal.
4. Sunil Kumar Deswal @ Pappu son of Jaswant Singh, Manager/Incharge Island Water Park, G.T.Road, near village Kohand, Tehsil Gharaunda, Distt. Karnal-132114
5. Banwari Lal(Occupier) c/o Island Water Park, G.T.Road, near village Kohand, Tehsil Gharaunda, Distt. Karnal-132114, resident of House No.8, Sector 6, Urban Estate, karnal.

…….Opposite Party

 

Complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection

Act, 2019.

 

Before        Sh. Jaswant Singh……….President.

                   Sh. Vineet Kaushik………Member.

                   Ms.Dr.Rekha Chaudhary, Member

 

Present: Shri S.S.Moonak, counsel for the complainant.

               Complaint presented on 3.4.2023 and fixed for today. Today, the learned counsel for complainant suffered his separate statement to the effect that he does not want to pursue with the present complaint and withdraws the same on technical defect and sought permission to file afresh on the same cause of action before the competent jurisdiction.

               In view of statement of learned counsel for complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be at liberty to file afresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced

Dated:05.04.2023               

                          President,      

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary) 

  Member                Member